1) Release the head, currently know as 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT, as 1.1.5.
2) During the release process, the release plugin prompts for the next
version number. Answer 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT to the prompt.
Paul Spencer
Manfred Geiler wrote:
1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO.
You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the 1.1.5 of
current core?
I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the style of
Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right?
--Manfred
On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of MyFaces, then
how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6?
This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version independently of
MyFaces.
Paul Spencer
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well.
>
> other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get
out of
> sync.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
>> Branch 1.1.5 created.
>>
>> --Manfred
>>
>>
>> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off.
>> > > We must decide between
>> > > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core
1.1.4 and
>> > > therefore might confuse users
>> > > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a
>> tomahawk
>> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5
>> >
>> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be compatible
with
>> > Core 1.1.5.
>> >
>> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone asks "what
>> > happened" to 1.1.4. As Paul points out, Tomcat skips version
numbers
>> > in their public release series.)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wendy
>> >
>>
>
>
