+1 for JSF 1.2 . It's more intuitive. Dennis Byrne
On 5/17/07, Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for 1.2. IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec releases. Cheers, Zubin. On 5/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, > > any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ? > > -Matthias > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > I am > > +1 for Paul's suggestion: > > JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x > > JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x > > > > and I am > > +1 for JSF 2.0 (or JSF6 or whatever) -> MyFaces 3.x > > > --Manfred >
-- Dennis Byrne
