We're talking about the jsf-api method signatures.
Either they match the spec/JSF RI api docs, or they don't :-)
Yes, it's painful to go through and verify each one (I'd think that
the TCK would do that), but I don't see how it can be avoided.
On 6/5/07, Bruno Aranda (JIRA) <dev@myfaces.apache.org> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Aranda resolved MYFACES-1262.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
I guess we can close this one, as it is difficult to assess when will be done
and the current implementation works fine
> JSR-252 Issue #99: Specified Java EE 5 Generics usage where applicable.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-1262
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1262
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: JSR-252
> Reporter: Stan Silvert
> Assignee: Mathias Broekelmann
> Fix For: 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
>
>
> Specified Java EE 5 Generics usage where applicable.
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=99
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
