I think it should be as simple as for each of "busy" and
"ready", render the facet if it's present, the icon if it's not.

-- Adam


On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm not as simple as I though. Before pushing a patch let decide on the
> behavior for every use case:
>
> Both facets are specified and rendered --> Don't render any icon
> Both facets are specified but only one is rendered --> ?
>  Both facets are specified but neither are rendered --> ?
>  Only one facet is specified and rendered --> Don't render any icon or
> render the icon of the missing facet?
> Only one facet is specified but not rendered --> ?
> No facet is specified --> Render both icons
>
> ~ Simon
>
>
> On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Or put tr:icon in the facet. Yeah, that sound good too.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > that sounds like the best solution.
> > >
> > > On 9/18/07, Adam Winer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > IMO, if we have a facet, we don't render the icon.  No need
> > > > for an attribute at all.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone that desperately needs both the facet and the icon
> > > > can render two statusIndicators.
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 9/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/18/07, Simon Lessard < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Speaking of which, I forgot to add skin documentation. I'll do
> that right
> > > > > > away.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would also like to add a new attribute to skip the icon
> rendering. If it
> > > > > > hasn't been of backward compatibility, I would have simply removed
> them
> > > > >
> > > > > I added a demo usage of the facet's, I was thinking, that it
> shouldn't
> > > > > render the "default" icon,
> > > > > glad you pointed it out now.
> > > > >
> > > > > > since it's easily doable with a combination of facet and tr:icon,
> but since
> > > > > > we had a release with the statusIndicator already, that's out of
> question.
> > > > > > So, what I need now is a decent attribute name. What do you think
> of
> > > > > > "renderIcon" or "renderFacetsOnly"?
> > > > >
> > > > > I tend to like renderFacetsOnly, because that what you added where
> facets.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps, we can change that soon, that when facet's are specified,
> we
> > > > > don't render the "default" icon.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ~ Simon
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to