Sorry, resending to dev list. Hi!
And why not helping fixing the tomahak component? Shouldn't we stop duplicating work and making the user worring about which comp-lib to choose? Mario -----Original Message----- From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, Dez 15, 2007 3:36 pm Subject: Re: [site] preferred doc format for website To: Reply- "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> -1 on APT >+1 on XML > >On Dec 15, 2007 3:29 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > >> I'm experimenting with some changes to the myfaces site. > >> I see that there are some files in maven APT format, and some in XDOC. Which >> is the preferred format for files? > >> In particular, I'd like to split docs into versions that explicitly talk >> about either JSF11 or JSF12. Which format should I write the new files in? > >> Personally, I'm currently neutral. XML can be a pain sometimes, and is less >> readable in raw form. However xdoc is a standard while APT is > maven-specific. > >> Opinions? > >> Regards, Simon > > > > >-- >Matthias Wessendorf > >further stuff: >blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > >
