On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. I know there has been some talk about creating a Tomahawk JSF 1.2 > branch. I don't imagine that Tomahawk would use the commons before (and if) > this happens anyway. Still, it would be nice to make the migration as > painless as possible. :) > There exists on tomahawk right now a modules called core12 and sandbox/core12. I have made some work adding tomahawk converters and validators to myfaces commons, to then reference > > Scott > > Leonardo Uribe wrote: > > >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> Hey Leonardo, >> >> Let me take a look at this tonight. As you know, I hope to have >> the configurator package checked in soon into commons which will >> do this as well. Right now it fits Trinidad's requirements pretty >> well but I'd like to see how it stacks up to Tomahawk's. In >> trinidad I plan to make their existing File object a wrapper when >> used with the commons configurator so that the fileupload >> components can be interchangeable. If I can address all of >> Tomahawk's requirements as well, then you guys can do the same.. >> >> >> Ok thanks!. Long time ago, I take ExternalContextUtils (because >> myfaces-commons-utils is for java 1.5) and correct some stuff to make it >> compatible with java 1.4 (on tomahawk is on >> org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.util). Definitively it is necessary to do >> something with utils, because trinidad 1.0.x is java 1.4, so this cannot use >> myfaces-commons utils. >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> >> Scott >> >> >> Leonardo Uribe wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have made some changes (enabled multipart content support >> for TomahawkFacesContextWrapper) on tomahawk. >> >> The objective is have a solution of MYFACES-434 Myfaces >> Portlet Enhancement. >> >> I have tested this and works fine for me, but the last time >> there was some problems doing this, so better advice dev list >> about the changes. >> >> I'm enhancing the documentation and adding fileupload support >> for portlets. >> >> Suggestions are welcome >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> >> >> >
