+1


2008/11/4 Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I totally agree with this;
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 12:15 PM
> >> To: MyFaces Development
> >> Subject: [orchestra flow] support JSF1.2 only?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Currently orchestra-flow 0.0.1 supports JSF1.1. However in order to
> >> allow pages that declare orchestra flows to be *included* in other
> >> pages, eg
> >>   <ui:include src="somePageThatCallsAFlow">
> >>     <ui:param name="vname" value="value"/>
> >>   </ui:include>
> >> the EL expressions in the included page need to be build using the
> >> correct ELContext object (otherwise they cannot see the params).
> >>
> >> Rather than build some kind of reflection-based solution, it would be
> >> simpler to just ditch JSF1.1 support for orchestra-flow.
> >>
> >> Note that there are no plans to ditch JSF1.1 support for orchestra-core
> >> ..
> >>
> >> Any objections?
> >>
> >> Regards, Simon.
> >>
> >> --
> >> -- Emails in "mixed" posting style will be ignored
> >> -- (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style)
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to