ok i just added the details to ensure that there are no misunderstandings.

-> +1

regards,
gerhard



2009/2/26 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>

> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Gerhard Petracek
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > hello matthias,
> >
> > yes - the license of the api (and also of hibernate validator v4 as ri
> > impl.) is asl 2.0
> > anyway, you can use every impl.! currently just the api of the spec. is
>
> yes, I just wanted to say, IF apache offers an impl, we should go with
> that...
>
> -M
>
> > required.
> > the current maven dep. of this module is:
> > ...
> >             <groupId>javax.validation</groupId>
> >             <artifactId>validation-api</artifactId>
> > ...
> >
> > at the moment the hello world example uses the ri impl. however, that
> isn't
> > a dependency of the integration module.
> > -> we can change the dependency of the example at any time.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/2/26 Matthias Wessendorf <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Gerhard Petracek
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > hello,
> >> >
> >> > this week i started with the integration of jsr 303.
> >> >
> >> > the good news: the base mechanism is already working (without changing
> >> > existing api's)
> >> > the very good news: it's working with the existing jsf versions (as
> you
> >> > can
> >> > see in the jsr 303 public draft it normally requires some adjustments)
> >> >
> >> > instead of an own impl. of the spec. i suggest an adapter for existing
> >> > implementations which just uses the bean-validation api. -> if a
> project
> >>
> >> +1 on an adapter, since the RI (as far as I know) is licensed to ASL 2.0
> >> (kudos to JBoss/the EG for that)
> >>
> >> I am not sure if the Jakarta folks (they have some simple validations)
> >> plan
> >> to write one, if so we should (IMO) focus on that one...
> >>
> >> -M
> >>
> >> > already uses bean-validation outside the view-layer, you just have one
> >> > bean-validation implementation for the whole project. furthermore,
> >> > extval
> >> > will additionally provide some of its currently available features [1]
> >> > (as
> >> > much as possible).
> >> >
> >> > regards,
> >> > gerhard
> >> >
> >> > [1]
> http://people.apache.org/~gpetracek/myfaces/extval/comparison.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Egpetracek/myfaces/extval/comparison.html>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to