On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Martin Kočí <martin.k...@aura.cz> wrote:
>
> Ok, I will propose changes with [Trinidad 2] topic.
>
> Matthias, I see you sometimes post in d...@javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> too - is that the right mailing list for discussion about JSF RI 2
> development? I found two bugs in mojarra trunk already :)

go with MyFaces ;-) Developement is much more open here, IMO ;-)

-Matthias

>
> Matthias Wessendorf píše v Út 17. 03. 2009 v 11:25 +0100:
>> Hey Martin
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Martin Kočí <martin.k...@aura.cz> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > we are migrating our company-internal renderkit to JSF 2.0 at the
>> > moment.Trinidad 1.2.X is not compatible with JSF 2.0 so I created some
>> > patches.
>>
>> Not yet; correct. However, we started to put in things like the visitor 
>> pattern;
>> see this patch from Blake:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Is there any "official" effort for migrating Trinidad to JSF 2.0? We can
>> > join it and provide more patches with time.
>>
>> yes, there is a plan to have a Trinidad 2.0 that covers JSF 2.0. The base
>> for that is, as you already figured, the 1.2.x line. However, there are no
>> efforts in the near future, meaning next two month.
>>
>> That said, help is always welcome. I'd suggest to use a subject like
>> "[Trinidad 2] my concrete subject" for the discussion of these patches,
>> changes, etc.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Matthias
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to