+1
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Manfred Geiler<manfred.gei...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > thanks leonardo > --Manfred > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 04:24, Leonardo Uribe<lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi >> >> Myfaces core 1.2.7 and 1.1.7 were released. So we can close this vote and >> make the necessary changes. Just to note it, after reading all previous >> emails the suggested layout is this: >> >> /trunk -> 2.0 >> /branches/1.1.x >> /branches/1.2.x >> >> If no objections I'll do the necessary changes on svn (note that to do this >> change we need to update nightly build configuration and I can't help with >> that). >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> >> 2009/5/28 Simon Lessard <simon.lessar...@gmail.com> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> sure! >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > +1, but just a small suggestion. Right now I'm running the necessary >>>> > steps >>>> > for release myfaces core 1.2.7, core 1.1.7, so I would like if it is >>>> > possible to delay this change after the release. >>>> > >>>> > regards >>>> > >>>> > Leonardo Uribe >>>> > >>>> > 2009/5/27 Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civ...@gmail.com> >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 for sure >>>> >> >>>> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> +1 sounds good to me >>>> >>> >>>> >>> 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >>>> >>> > so, there are no objections in making the MyFaces 2.0 efforts >>>> >>> > become >>>> >>> > trunk ? >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > -Matthias >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Bernd Bohmann >>>> >>> > <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> wrote: >>>> >>> >> Hello, >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> +1 >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> I would prefer >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> /trunk -> 2.0 >>>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.1.x >>>> >>> >> /branches/myfaces-1.2.x >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> because we are not using cvs anymore >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> and the path already contains >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> Regards >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> Bernd >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>> >> <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> actually, I agree with Bernd. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> For the following layout: >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> /trunk -> 2.0 >>>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_1_x >>>> >>> >>> /branches/myfaces_1_2_x >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: >>>> >>> >>> -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) >>>> >>> >>> -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it >>>> >>> >>> trunk) >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> So, I am +1 on the above "svn layout" >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>> >>> <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> from Bernd, on a different thread: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> I would suggest following layout >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> 1.1.x branch/1.1.x >>>> >>> >>>> 1.2.x branch/1.2.x >>>> >>> >>>> 2.0.x trunk >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> because the 2.0.x version is in development the other branches >>>> >>> >>>> are >>>> >>> >>>> only in bugfix state. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Werner Punz >>>> >>> >>>> <werner.p...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>> >>> >>>>>> ... >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> Ok, I filed this: >>>> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2053 >>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>>> maybe we should also think about making the JSF 1.1.x stuff a >>>> >>> >>>>>>> branch ... >>>> >>> >>>>>>> (since we already work on 2.0.x....) >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>>> what do people think if the 1.2 stuff becomes "trunk" >>>> >>> >>>>>> And the following efforts are on a branch: >>>> >>> >>>>>> -2.0.x >>>> >>> >>>>>> -1.1.x >>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>> +1 >>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> >>> >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>> >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > -- >>>> >>> > Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> >>> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> > >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>> >>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >> >> >
