Sent from my iPod.
On 30.07.2009, at 01:30, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
2009/7/29 Simon Lessard <simon.lessar...@gmail.com>
Hi,
Ok it's commited. I tried to add some comments to the code prior to
the commit. Mostly, what need to be done is the implementation of :
FaceletViewDeclarationLanguage
- getComponentMetadata
- getScriptComponentResource
- getStateManagementStrategy
- renderView also need to be revisited most likely
Thanks a lot Simon. I was waiting for this.
Various tag handlers requires to be plugged with the delegate
pattern (am I the only one finding that part not incredibly clear?).
Anyway, I'll try to read more on those and at worst check Mojarra a
bit and try to contribute on that.
I have seen it, too. I tried to find documentation but there is very
few (almost no comments). I suppose we have to check mojarra source
code to
see what's the intention of this workaround.
What's the deal with looking at their sources? IMO we should not do
this..
Theoretically, the Facelet compiler should work with the current
code, but I didn't try it.
I tried run facelets compiler before this commit and it works with
small fixes.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Michael Concini
<mconc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Great news. Thanks a lot.
Simon Lessard wrote:
Hi,
I'll try to commit that tonight.
~ Simon
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Michael Concini
<mconc...@gmail.com <mailto:mconc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Simon,
I wanted to do a quick follow up here. There are a few of us who
are ready to start filling in the gaps once the initial commit is
done. Have you had a chance to look into committing what you have
so far yet? Any ETA on when you might be able to do that so we
can get started?
Thanks,
Mike
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hey simon,
is it possible to commit your current stuff ? Once it is kinda
visible,
others could provide the missing bits.
-Matthias
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Simon
Lessard<simon_less...@dmr.ca <mailto:simon_less...@dmr.ca>>
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to work on it, but frankly I'm overloaded
beyond what I was
expecting so I could use help quite badly. Theoretically,
three parts
remains to the integration:
1. Link the Facelets code with the Delegate pattern on API
side;
2. Finish the Facelet VDL (Facelets compiler integration)
3. Adjust some classes (should be minor, mainly regarding
delegates that
could have been handled in 1)
Regards,
~ Simon
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
<mat...@apache.org <mailto:mat...@apache.org>>
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Leonardo
Uribe<lu4...@gmail.com <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hi
Just a small question: What is the status of
facelets integration?.
After
review the work done at this time in myfaces core
2.0.x, facelets
integration code are becoming most critical. The
remaining points listed
below:
- Facelets PDL
- Client behavior API (depends from facelets and
composite component
stuff)
- Error handling API (and run through existing
classes to make sure the
new
exception specification is enforced)
- Partial view API
- Partial State Saving (pending integration with
facelets)
- New tags (mostly linked to Facelets)
depends in one way or another with facelets. It is
safe to work on it or
there is some unknown code to be committed? I want
to contribute in this
I think Simon has some facelets-related code.
area but it could be good to know which parts
needs help and what things
are
done to prevent duplicate work.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
