Ok... they moved the BUG to be SPEC specific, which means (to my understanding) that this won't be solved in the near future. See the spec ticket here:
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=662 as there was no veto on using "trinidad", I committed it to the source; There shouldn't be big issues with that ... and if they fix the behavior, we can always change it and release note the issue, but I guess there is almost on problem with that... -Matthias On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > As there are some limitations (see TRINIDAD-1603) and picking an ugly one, > like > > <faces-config> > > <name> > org_apache_myfaces_trinidad > </name> > ... > > </faces-config> > > doesn't make much sense, what do folks think about picking a > simplified version ? > > <faces-config> > <name> > trinidad > </name> > ... > </faces-config> > > There shouldn't be much issues with "trinidad" as the (kinda) unique name... > > Thoughts ? > > -Matthias > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Andy Schwartz > <andy.g.schwa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey Matthias - >> >> I like "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad". >> >> Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks >> have done. I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will >> pass along any responses. >> >> Andy >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
