[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834248#action_12834248
 ] 

Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2561:
-----------------------------------------

It is a know problem about the semantic of #{cc}. In this case it resolves to 
the closest composite component and in that case is the same one. See this two 
topics on jsr-314-open mailing list (specially the first one):

[jsr-314-open] #{cc} semantics
[jsr-314-open] cc.parent mystery

In http://wiki.jcp.org/wiki/index.php?page=JSF+2.0+Rev+A+Change+Log it appears 
like:

C034     Change          Modify table 5-10 to state that implicit object cc 
returns the current composite component, relative to the composite component 
markup page in which the expression appears 

I'm keeping an eye on this change (there is other related to cc.parent 
resolution). It could be good to know what ri does in this case.

It could be good to have a patch for this one.



> StackOverflowError if a composite component implementation uses another 
> composite component
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MYFACES-2561
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561
>             Project: MyFaces Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JSR-314
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-beta-3
>            Reporter: Jakob Korherr
>            Assignee: Jakob Korherr
>
> If you use another composite component in your composite component's 
> implementation you will get a StackOverflowError.
> javax.faces.FacesException: java.lang.StackOverflowError
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.context.ExceptionHandlerImpl.wrap(ExceptionHandlerImpl.java:241)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.context.ExceptionHandlerImpl.handle(ExceptionHandlerImpl.java:156)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:216)
>       at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:191)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293)
>       at 
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:849)
>       at 
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583)
>       at 
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:454)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:637)
> Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError
>       at java.util.ArrayList.toArray(ArrayList.java:306)
>       at java.util.logging.Logger.getHandlers(Logger.java:1200)
>       at 
> java.util.logging.LogManager$RootLogger.getHandlers(LogManager.java:1019)
>       at java.util.logging.Logger.log(Logger.java:454)
>       at java.util.logging.Logger.doLog(Logger.java:480)
>       at java.util.logging.Logger.logp(Logger.java:680)
>       at org.apache.juli.logging.DirectJDKLog.log(DirectJDKLog.java:167)
>       at org.apache.juli.logging.DirectJDKLog.error(DirectJDKLog.java:135)
>       at org.apache.catalina.connector.Request.setAttribute(Request.java:1448)
>       at 
> org.apache.catalina.connector.RequestFacade.setAttribute(RequestFacade.java:503)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.context.servlet.RequestMap.setAttribute(RequestMap.java:53)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.util.AbstractAttributeMap.put(AbstractAttributeMap.java:113)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.util.AbstractAttributeMap.put(AbstractAttributeMap.java:1)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.FacesCompositeELResolver.setScope(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:191)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.FacesCompositeELResolver.getValue(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:139)
>       at org.apache.el.parser.AstIdentifier.getValue(AstIdentifier.java:61)
>       at org.apache.el.parser.AstValue.getValue(AstValue.java:107)
>       at 
> org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:186)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:84)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.CompositeComponentELResolver$CompositeComponentAttributesMapWrapper.get(CompositeComponentELResolver.java:245)
>       at javax.el.MapELResolver.getValue(MapELResolver.java:51)
>       at javax.el.CompositeELResolver.getValue(CompositeELResolver.java:54)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.FacesCompositeELResolver.getValue(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:140)
>       at org.apache.el.parser.AstValue.getValue(AstValue.java:118)
>       at 
> org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:186)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:84)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.CompositeComponentELResolver$CompositeComponentAttributesMapWrapper.get(CompositeComponentELResolver.java:245)
>       at javax.el.MapELResolver.getValue(MapELResolver.java:51)
>       at javax.el.CompositeELResolver.getValue(CompositeELResolver.java:54)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.FacesCompositeELResolver.getValue(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:140)
>       at org.apache.el.parser.AstValue.getValue(AstValue.java:118)
>       at 
> org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:186)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:84)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.CompositeComponentELResolver$CompositeComponentAttributesMapWrapper.get(CompositeComponentELResolver.java:245)
>       at javax.el.MapELResolver.getValue(MapELResolver.java:51)
>       at javax.el.CompositeELResolver.getValue(CompositeELResolver.java:54)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.FacesCompositeELResolver.getValue(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:140)
>       at org.apache.el.parser.AstValue.getValue(AstValue.java:118)
>       at 
> org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:186)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.view.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:84)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.CompositeComponentELResolver$CompositeComponentAttributesMapWrapper.get(CompositeComponentELResolver.java:245)
>       at javax.el.MapELResolver.getValue(MapELResolver.java:51)
>       at javax.el.CompositeELResolver.getValue(CompositeELResolver.java:54)
>       at 
> org.apache.myfaces.el.unified.resolver.FacesCompositeELResolver.getValue(FacesCompositeELResolver.java:140)
>       at org.apache.el.parser.AstValue.getValue(AstValue.java:118)
> ......
> ......

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to