will look at it. btw, I'm available in #myfaces and #openwebbeans currently
LieGrue, strub --- Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> schrieb am Fr, 5.3.2010: > Von: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > An: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > Datum: Freitag, 5. März, 2010 22:20 Uhr > Hi Mark, > > Your test container stuff looks good. Unfortunately I can't > get it to work in my environment (neither from within > eclipse nor with maven). The instanceRetrievalTest fails > with a > javax.enterprise.inject.ResolutionException: cannot find > beans for class > org.apache.webbeans.cditest.test.SessionScopedTestBean > at > org.apache.webbeans.cditest.owb.CdiTestOpenWebBeansContainer.getInstance(CdiTestOpenWebBeansContainer.java:154) > at > org.apache.webbeans.cditest.test.TestOwbTestContainer.testInstanceRetrieval(TestOwbTestContainer.java:37) > ... > I wonder if it is a classpath issue? I guess the stuff > works on your environment. I'll take a further look into > it. > > What do the others think about adding this test support to > CODI and implementing the CdiTestContainer for weld? > > When I get this working I'll write some tests for my > @Transactional stuff. > > Regards, > Arne > > -- > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise Developer > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg > Mobil: +49 (0) 170 - 2733627 > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0 > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111 > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > http://www.openknowledge.de > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > Gesendet: Freitag, 5. März 2010 20:46 > An: MyFaces Development > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > Hi Arne! > > Since we have OpenWebBeans-M4 officially released today, my > test container stuff is now available [1]. > > It would be really fine if you could review the > implementation and give me some feedback if you miss > something. > > I used both JUnit and testng for testing OWB projects in > the past and most times it was enough to have a central > class which holds one single CDI container in a static field > and shuts it down in a finalize(). I only run > > container.stopContexts(); > container.startContexts(); > > before each test method to wipe out contextual instances > from the contexts. Of course, if you like to test > CDI-Extensions and stuff, you might need to bootstrap the > container for each test. But imo this is better handled by > writing integration tests and using the maven-invoker-plugin > for such cases. > > Btw, if you have already worked with Weld, then you may > eventually write the CDI test adaptor for Weld? Please ping > me if you are interested, it's really easy to integrate. > The OWB test provider is already part of OWB, what do you > guys think about adding the Weld provider to CODI so we can > test it with both OWB and Weld? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openwebbeans/trunk/webbeans-test/ > > --- Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > schrieb am Do, 4.3.2010: > > > Von: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > An: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > > Datum: Donnerstag, 4. März, 2010 22:09 Uhr > > Hi! > > > > I am currently working on a JUnit-Solution for CDI (I > want > > to have CDI-Container-Managed TestCases running with > JUnit, > > but this is another topic we should discuss on > another > > thread). So I did not so much at the > EntityManager-front. > > I'll write a detailed Mail about my source this > weekend. > > > > For now I can say: > > My solution is meant to work for extended > EntityManagers > > that are open during an arbitrary scope is active. > > > > If someone of you has the time, he can upload the > sources > > from the wiki (I have not further worked on it yet). > As I > > mentioned I'll write a mail about the source this > weekend. > > > > Regards, > > Arne > > > > -- > > > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise Developer > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg > > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg > > Mobil: +49 (0) 170 - 2733627 > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0 > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111 > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. März 2010 20:47 > > An: MyFaces Development > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > Hi! > > > > Uploading the source is al always a good idea, so we > can > > further discuss this really complicated topic. > > > > Is this meant to work for extended EntityManagers or > for > > transactional JTA managed ones? > > > > Another question: does this require the EntityManager > to > > have a certain scope? For the extended EM variant of > course, > > for JTA managed we will most certainly use > @Dependent, > > right? > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > > schrieb am Do, 4.3.2010: > > > > > Von: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > An: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > > > Datum: Donnerstag, 4. März, 2010 20:39 Uhr > > > hi arne, > > > i created a jira issue for it > > > [1].could you please upload your > > > implementation.+ a short description about the > > > possible usages as well as restrictions (if > > > present). > > > > > > > > > thx & regards,gerhard > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-4 > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/20 Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I’ve updated my > > > code at > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/CDI/DevDoc/Drafts/Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not really > > > tested and lacks some fallback-scenarios (i.e. > > > null-handling, etc.), but it is a starting point > to > > inject > > > scoped > > > EntityManagers for every CDI-scope. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne Limburg - > > > Enterprise Developer > > > > > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, > > > Oldenburg > > > > > > Bismarckstraße 13, > > > 26122 Oldenburg > > > > > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - > > > 108 22 942 > > > > > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - > > > 4082-0 > > > > > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - > > > 4082-111 > > > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registergericht: > > > Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: > > > Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Gerhard Petracek > > > [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 15. Februar 2010 13:44 > > > > > > An: MyFaces > > > Development > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] > > > @Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi arne, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thx for providing the source code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i'll have a look at it after the > > > jsfdays. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > one of the goals is to provide an > > > alternative conversation > > > scope for cdi which allows to use the > conversation > > concepts > > > provided by > > > orchestra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so we have to ensure that it works > > > with every custom cdi > > > scope. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (cdi conversations would be the > > > default scope) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/15 Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I've prototyped some code that injects > > > conversation-scoped EntityManagers > > > reading the unitName from the qualifier > annotation > > and > > > added @Transactional > > > support for this EntityManagers. This code needs > some > > > thinking though, e.g. how > > > to handle the default-case (no unitName > specified)... > > > > > > > > > > > > If you want to take a look at it, I have created > a > > Wiki > > > page and added my code > > > as attachment: > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/CDI/DevDoc/Drafts/Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > This code could be a starting point to implement > > > Orchestra-like conversations > > > (starting with CDI-Conversations)... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise Developer > > > > > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg > > > > > > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg > > > > > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 942 > > > > > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0 > > > > > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111 > > > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 > > > 20:27 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An: MyFaces Development > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am afraid supporting multiple > persistence-units > > in > > > that > > > > > > > scenario is very difficult... > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, it's really easy. I simply use Qualifiers > to > > > distinguish between them. > > > > > > > > > > > > @Qualifier > > > > > > public @instance Core {} > > > > > > > > > > > > @Qualifier > > > > > > public @instance Other {} > > > > > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > @RequestScoped > > > > > > public class EMProducer { > > > > > > private @PersistenceContext(unitName="core") > > > EntityManager emCore; > > > > > > private @PersistenceContext(unitName="other") > > > EntityManager emOther; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public @Produces @Core EntityManager getCoreEM() > > {return > > > emCore;} > > > > > > public @Produces @Other EntityManager > getOtherEM() > > {return > > > emOther;} > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Injection happens with > > > > > > > > > > > > private @Inject @Core EntityManager > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Got the idea? > > > > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > schrieb am Sa, 13.2.2010: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > > > > An: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > > > > > > > Datum: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010, 20:06 > > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thank you for your feedback. I was aware of > the > > > requirement > > > > > > > of CDI-containers to inject JavaEE resources > in > > a > > > > > > > JavaEE-environment, but Gerhard and I are > > thinking > > > about a > > > > > > > generic non-JavaEE-solution for > > > EntityManager-injection. And > > > > > > > at least weld does no injection of > > JavaEE-resources in > > > this > > > > > > > case. How does OpenWebBeans? > > > > > > > I am afraid supporting multiple > persistence-units > > in > > > that > > > > > > > scenario is very difficult... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonetheless it would be nice to see your > > > > > > > multiple-database-handling > TransactionInterceptor > > in > > > CODI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise Developer > > > > > > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg > > > > > > > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 Oldenburg > > > > > > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 942 > > > > > > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0 > > > > > > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111 > > > > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > > > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB > 4670 > > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: Lars Röwekamp, Jens > Schumann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > > Von: Mark Struberg [mailto:strub...@yahoo.de] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 15:39 > > > > > > > An: MyFaces Development > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The JSR-299 spec defines that we have to > support > > > injection > > > > > > > of EE-Resources. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This was more explicit in the old version of > the > > spec, > > > but > > > > > > > unless the wording got shortened, I still > think > > > injection of > > > > > > > @PersistenceUnit and @PersistenceContext > must be > > > supported > > > > > > > by any JSR-299 container (at least in an EE > > > environment). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For OpenWebBeans, you can simply use our > > > > > > > openwebbeans-resource plugin. Please note > that > > this > > > is > > > > > > > necessary because OWB is modular, and > > > openwebbeans-impl (the > > > > > > > core) will have no EE dependencies at all > (not > > even > > > JSF, > > > > > > > JPA, etc!) This will get picked up > automatically > > if it > > > is > > > > > > > available in the classpath, e.g. you can > simply > > define > > > the > > > > > > > following maven dependency: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <groupId>org.apache.openwebbeans</groupId> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <artifactId>openwebbeans-resource</artifactId> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <version>${owb.version}</version> > > > > > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OWB supports 2 different scenarios. If you > are > > not > > > running > > > > > > > in a JTA aware container like e.g. OpenEJB, > you > > will > > > > > > > automatically use a simple resource version > of an > > SPI > > > > > > > implementation which uses > > > > > > > > Persistence#createEntityManagerFactory(unitName) > > for > > > > > > > injecting (Thus getting an extended EM). If > you > > use > > > e.g. > > > > > > > OpenEJB, we are able to get the injectable > > resources > > > > > > > directly from there (thus getting a > > transactional > > > EM). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once this is available, you can simply > create a > > > producer > > > > > > > method for the EntityManager: > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/reservation/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/reservation/util/EntityManagerUtil.java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is also an example on how to implement > a > > > > > > > TransactionalInterceptor: > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/reservation/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/reservation/intercept/TransactionalInterceptor.java > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In my company, I already implemented a > > > > > > > TransactionalInteceptor which is capable of > > handling > > > > > > > multiple databases at a time and also > correctly > > > handles > > > > > > > nested transactions. I hope to migrate this > over > > to > > > CODI in > > > > > > > the near future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > > > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > > schrieb am Sa, 13.2.2010: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > > > > > An: "'MyFaces Development'" > > > <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > > > > > > > > Datum: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010, > 14:42 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Gerhard, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, I got what you did, > > > > > > > > basically I did the same. You are > right, > > > > > > > > that was pretty straight-forward, but I > had > > to > > > > > > > hard-code > > > > > > > > the persistence-unit > > > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have two ideas to inject the > > > > > > > > persistence-unit name into the > > > > > > > > producer-method for the EntityManager: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First idea: A > > > > > > > > @PersistenceUnitName > qualifier-annotation > > to > > > > > > > > inject the name into the > producer-method. > > Client > > > code > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > have somethink like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class Configuration > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > �...@produces > > > > > > > > @PersistenceUnitName > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > String > > > > > > > > getPersistenceUnitName() { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > … > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not really nice, but the > > > > > > > > simplest solution to generify it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Second idea: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The @PersistenceContext > > > > > > > > qualifier has a @Nonbind attribute > > > > > > > > persistenceUnitName which we can > extract in > > the > > > > > > > producer > > > > > > > > method. But then we > > > > > > > > get in scoping issues. Especially when > > having > > > > > > > multiple > > > > > > > > persistence-units within > > > > > > > > one deployment. The second problem is: > How > > can > > > the > > > > > > > > @Transactional annotation > > > > > > > > know the persistence-unit-name. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise > > > > > > > > Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, > > > > > > > > Oldenburg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bismarckstraße 13, 26122 > > > > > > > > Oldenburg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 > > > > > > > > 942 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - > > > > > > > > 4082-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - > > > > > > > > 4082-111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registergericht: Amtsgericht > > > > > > > > Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: Lars > > > > > > > > Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Gerhard Petracek > > > > > > > > [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Samstag, 13. Februar 2010 > 14:32 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An: MyFaces Development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi arne, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i used the EntityManager to get > > > > > > > > an EntityTransaction. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you have to use cdi to create and > > > > > > > > inject it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (i used some producer methods.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i created @PersistenceUnit which > > > > > > > > is a cdi qualifier and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Transactional which is a cdi > > > > > > > > interceptor binding. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basically it works and it isn't > > > > > > > > hard to use. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > however, we have to think about an > > > > > > > > approach to provide as > > > > > > > > much as possible in a generic way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache > MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/13 Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Gerhard, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did > > > > > > > > you mean „i used > > > > > > > > UserTransaction”? If not, how do you > > receive > > > your > > > > > > > > EntityTransaction? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > working on a solution to > > > > > > > > get request-scoped EntityManagers > injected > > within > > > a > > > > > > > > servlet-container that does > > > > > > > > not even support the web-profile (which > are > > the > > > > > > > current > > > > > > > > jetty and the current > > > > > > > > tomcat). I am not able to get an > > EntityManager > > > > > > > injected via > > > > > > > > @PersistenceContext > > > > > > > > in that environment. So it would be > nice if > > there > > > were > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > CDI-Extension to > > > > > > > > achieve this. The implementation would > be > > pretty > > > > > > > > straight-forward except the > > > > > > > > configuration of the persistence-unit > name > > and > > > the > > > > > > > handling > > > > > > > > of different > > > > > > > > persistence-units within one > CDI-deployment > > > > > > > > unit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using > > > > > > > > JTA-Transactions vs. > > > > > > > > resource-local EntityTransactions is > > another > > > issue > > > > > > > > here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > Limburg - Enterprise > > > > > > > > Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, > > > > > > > > Oldenburg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bismarckstraße > > > > > > > > 13, 26122 Oldenburg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mobil: +49 (0) 151 > > > > > > > > - 108 22 942 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tel: +49 (0) 441 - > > > > > > > > 4082-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fax: +49 (0) 441 - > > > > > > > > 4082-111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registergericht: > > > > > > > > Amtsgericht Oldenburg, > > > > > > > > HRB 4670 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: > > > > > > > > Lars Röwekamp, Jens > > > > > > > > Schumann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: Gerhard > > > > > > > > Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 > 19:59 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An: MyFaces Development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Ext-CDI] @Transactional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hi > > > > > > > > arne, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yes > > > > > > > > - i used EntityTransaction in the > prototype > > and > > > it > > > > > > > works > > > > > > > > pretty well in a > > > > > > > > servlet container (that was the base > idea). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gerhard > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache > MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2010/2/12 > > > > > > > > Arne Limburg <arne.limb...@openknowledge.de> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I saw the discussion of adding an > > > > > > > > @Transactional-Annotation to your > > > > > > > > CDI extensions. I think Gerhard wrote > it. I > > > wonder if > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > deals with JTA > > > > > > > > transactions (which indeed would be > pretty > > > > > > > > straight-forward) or with > > > > > > > > EntityTransactions of an > resource-local > > > EntityManager. > > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > working on the > > > > > > > > latter one and just would want to know > if > > someone > > > else > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > working on such > > > > > > > > stuff. I think it would be great, when > we > > could > > > > > > > archive > > > > > > > > injection of > > > > > > > > resource-local EntityManagers with > > > transaction-support > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > deploy it on a tomcat > > > > > > > > or jetty. What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Arne Limburg - Enterprise > > > > > > > > Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OpenKnowledge GmbH, Oldenburg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bismarckstraße > > > > > > > > 13, 26122 Oldenburg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mobil: > > > > > > > > +49 (0) 151 - 108 22 942 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tel: > > > > > > > > +49 (0) 441 - 4082-0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fax: > > > > > > > > +49 (0) 441 - 4082-111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arne.limb...@openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.openknowledge.de > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Registergericht: > > > > > > > > Amtsgericht Oldenburg, HRB 4670 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: > > > > > > > > Lars Röwekamp, Jens Schumann > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt > über > > einen > > > > > > > herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über > einen > > > herausragenden Schutz gegen > > > Massenmails. > > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen > > herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen > herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com
