Actually I think it will be able to get into 2.1 for sure.

I've already got the go ahead from Ryan Lubke to submit a patch for Mojarra,
so if you guys are on board, too, then I think it's easy to get added :)

It's so useful, I'm really excited to see it supported. I'll be in touch as
I work on patching Mojarra.

Let me know how it goes with MyFaces, and we can keep each other informed of
any issues we run in to.

Thanks!
--Lincoln

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Jakob Korherr (JIRA) <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843263#action_12843263]
>
> Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2590:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Hmm OK. This is actually not bad :)
>
> I personally really like CDI. I think it's a very great technique and it
> spares you lots of boilerplate code.
>
> Unfortunately, this will by no means get into the JSF 2.0 spec, I think.
> Maybe in JSF 2.NEXT but who knows.. However, I'll take a look at this,
> because it just seems right and it's a nice feature!
>
> > Web Container injection support should be provided for additional
> lifecycle artifacts (not just managed beans)
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: MYFACES-2590
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2590
> >             Project: MyFaces Core
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >          Components: JSR-314
> >         Environment: ALL
> >            Reporter: Lincoln Baxter III
> >
> > JSF implementations should treat the following framework components as
> JEE
> > components, and pass them through the default
> WebInjectionProvider.inject()
> > method part of any instantiation process. E.g: Whether or not the
> framework is
> > instantiating the object for it's use, or the user is asking the
> framework for a
> > new instance.
> > The benefit: This means that any container provided injection points
> would
> > automatically be available in the following artifacts:
> >     * ManagedBean
> >     * PhaseListener
> >     * SystemEventListener
> >     * Converter
> >     * Validator
> >     * ... more?
> > For extension writers:
> > Support for native container-injection for all artifacts defined in
> > section 11.4.6 of the JSR-314 spec.
> > ■ ActionListener
> > ■ ApplicationFactory
> > ■ FacesContextFactory
> > ■ LifecycleFactory
> > ■ NavigationHandler
> > ■ PropertyResolver
> > ■ RenderKit
> > ■ RenderKitFactory
> > ■ ResourceHandler
> > ■ StateManager
> > ■ VariableResolver
> > ■ ViewHandler
> > There is a related SPEC issue, Mojarra enhancement, and GlassFish bug
> also involved in getting this
> > standardized across the board:
> >
> https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=763
> > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11655
> > https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1578
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"

Reply via email to