Hi Scott, great news ;)
best regards, Martin On 6/23/10, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > That's cool!. Any plans for jsf 2.0 + portlets? > > regards, > > Leonardo > > 2010/6/22 Scott O'Bryan <darkar...@gmail.com> > >> Hello everyone, >> >> For those of you unfamiliar with the portlet-bridge project, it is >> essentially the R.I. implementation of JSR-301 and JSR-328. For over a >> year >> some core people have been working on getting the R.I. up to par. The one >> piece that was missing from this was the TCK. >> >> Well, Michael Freedman will be announcing the release of Portlet Bridge >> 1.0, which will become the R.I. for JSR-301 pending approvals. We also >> got >> the legalities of the TCK release figured out as well and I wanted to run >> things by the developers before putting a release of the project to a >> vote. >> >> Essentially, the TCK exists, en total, here at Apache and is run using a >> plugable maven build script instead of Sun's Portal TCK Harness like we >> were >> planning on using initially. What this means is that the TCK will be >> downloadable by anyone though the TCK project's svn repository right here >> at >> MyFaces. To my knowledge I think this is a first for Apache and will >> hopefully pave the way for continued support of the JCP from the Apache >> Community. >> >> I'd like to start a vote to release the official TCK for JSR-301 tomorrow >> but I wanted to do one final sanity check from the community to make sure >> this is still in line with what people want. When we talked about the TCK >> earlier, there were many questions as to why this TCK could not exist >> completely in the open source community and, in the end, that's exactly >> what >> we did. >> >> Thanks, >> Scott O'Bryan >> > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
