Cool. Thanks for the input Mark. I'm so used to building distributables that need a repository entry that my head wasn't on right. :) I think it's on straight now.
Sent from my iPhone On Jun 30, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hoi folks! > > +1 on this approach. > > This is btw exactly one of the arguments why the ASF board says that a signed > tarball with all the sources needed to build the project is exactly THE > release. And all the maven artifacts are nice to have but not as important as > the properly signed and voted source distribution. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Scott O'Bryan <[email protected]> >> To: MyFaces Development <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, June 30, 2010 9:34:01 PM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v. 1.0 >> >> Yeah Mike, I don't know what I was smoking. Generally people will > check >> out from SVN, but if they don't have SVN, then that is what our > artifacts >> should be. Having repo entries makes no sense for >> this > distributable. > > I documented a process and updated the >> artifacts. There are two > archive files, a tar.gz and a .zip.' they are >> essentially exports of > the svn repository. > > Sent from my >> iPhone > > On Jun 30, 2010, at 11:14 AM, Michael Freedman > < >> ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; >> href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]> >> wrote: > >> After looking at the artifacts and talking things through >> with Scott, we are proposing we go a different route with this release. >> What Scott had been thinking (and has built here) is a set of repository >> release >> artifacts he was hoping folks would be able to reference in their own Maven >> (bridge) projects so they could include, build and run the TCK directly from >> their project. Because this hasn't been tested (we don't do it yet with >> our own project) and after looking through what is actually in the artifacts >> I >> think its unlikely to be easily integratable. As it stands the TCK is >> constructed to be run in its own Maven project currently by accessing it from >> the Apache subversion repository location (of the release tag). So we are >> proposing that the release artifact mirror this: it will be a binary >> artifact (zip) containing all the Maven sources needed to build and run the >> TCK >> plus the UserManual. I.e. it will be an alternative to accessing the same >> in the SVN repository. >> >> Any questions or objections? Hoping >> that there won't be, Scott is working on generating this new artifact and >> once >> done we will repost the vote. >> -Mike- >> >> On >> 6/30/2010 8:54 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: >>> Hey >> Mike, >>> >>> I think if we update the wiki to the instructions >> in the svn repo for >>> now, that should be fine for >> testing. >>> >>> When the release happens I'll have the site >> updated. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On >> Jun 30, 2010, at 9:39 AM, Michael Freedman >>> < >> ymailto="mailto:[email protected]"; >> href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Actually please ignore the TCK >> usage information on the PB wiki (its a little stale -- I will update it). >> Untile we get the User Manual up on the site, download the file and view from >> the release tag: >>>> >> href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr301-1.0.0/Portlet%201.0%20Bridge%20for%20JavaServer%20Faces%201.2%20TCK%20User%27s%20Guide.html"; >> target=_blank >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/tck/tags/jsr301-1.0.0/Portlet%201.0%20Bridge%20for%20JavaServer%20Faces%201.2%20TCK%20User%27s%20Guide.html >>>> >>>> >> FYI ... the released TCK will also be built and run from the structure within >> this tag (as referenced by the User Manual). >>>> >> -Mike- >>>> >>>> On 6/30/2010 1:17 AM, Scott O'Bryan >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying to release the MyFaces >> Portlet Bridge TCK for JSR-301 v. 1.0.0 and am now beginning the formal >> vote. As stated in a previous email, the TCK for JSF Portlet Bridge >> related projects will be written and distributed through the Apache MyFaces >> Portlet Bridge project and made available to the community at large. This >> release does not include any binary artifacts, but rather several additions >> to >> the Maven Repository which can be included in other projects to facilitate >> automated testing. >>>>> >>>>> Likewise, the >> instructions (which should be on the website soon) will have full >> instructions >> on running the TCK. For now, please see the Portlet Bridge >> wiki. >>>>> >>>>> You can find the signed release >> candidate at [1] >>>>> >>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------ >>>>> [ ] +1 for >> community members who have reviewed the bits >>>>> [ ] >> +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not >> to be released, >>>>> and >> why.............. >>>>> >> ------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >> Thanks, >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> [1] >> http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr301-1.0.0/ >>>>> >>>>> > > >
