hi leonardo,

do you see the same issue with the generic support module of extval?

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2010/7/1 Leonardo Uribe <[email protected]>

> Hi
>
> In some cases, extval wraps renders but that has a side effect: all
> renderers annotated with @ListenerFor are not registered properly. That
> means h:outputScript / h:outputStylesheet stop working and there are not
> relocated anymore.
>
> So if you have a page like this:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
>         "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>  xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";
>  xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";
>  xmlns:composite="http://java.sun.com/jsf/composite";
>  >
> <h:head>
> </h:head>
> <h:body>
> <h:form id="mainForm">
>     <h:panelGrid columns="2">
>         <h:outputLabel for="outname" value="Name: " />
>         <h:inputText id="outname" value="#{helloWorld.name}"/>
>         <h:outputLabel for="inname" value="Please enter your name" />
>         <h:inputText id="inname" value="#{helloWorld.name}"/>
>         <h:commandButton id="button1" type="button" value="Ajax Update">
>             <f:ajax execute="mainForm" render="outname"/>
>         </h:commandButton>
>         <h:commandButton id="button2" value="Normal Submit"/>
>         <h:messages showDetail="true" showSummary="false"/>
>     </h:panelGrid>
> </h:form>
> </h:body>
> </html>
>
> With extval on the classpath, the script to be added on <head> by f:ajax
> tag handler is not relocated. Reproduce it is very easy, just add to a
> existing example this jars:
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator</groupId>
>             <artifactId>myfaces-extval-core</artifactId>
>             <version>2.0.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>
> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.validation-modules</groupId>
>             <artifactId>myfaces-extval-bean-validation</artifactId>
>             <version>2.0.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>
> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.extensions.validator.validation-modules</groupId>
>             <artifactId>myfaces-extval-property-validation</artifactId>
>             <version>2.0.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>javax.validation</groupId>
>             <artifactId>validation-api</artifactId>
>             <version>1.0.0.GA</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>           <groupId>org.hibernate</groupId>
>           <artifactId>hibernate-validator</artifactId>
>           <version>4.0.2.GA</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>           <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
>           <artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>
>           <version>1.5.6</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
>             <artifactId>slf4j-log4j12</artifactId>
>             <version>1.5.6</version>
>         </dependency>
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>log4j</groupId>
>             <artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
>             <version>${log4j.version}</version>
>             <type>jar</type>
>         </dependency>
>
> The solution could be create some wrapper for Application object that takes
> into account this case on ExtVal.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>

Reply via email to