I believe I added this JBoss repo a long time ago because of the Bean Validation API which was not yet released.
But I guess this API should at this time also be inside some Geronimo JAR? It might be worthwile to check which one. That would save a repo. Let's see..... Eehhhhmmm......... ........ Yes, it's there. See: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-validation_1.0_spec/1.0/ So I guess we can safely get rid of the JBoss repo. /JK 2010/8/19 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > s/tomcat/tomahawk/ ;) > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > > To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org> > > Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 7:15:44 PM > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of all java.net maven repositories > > > > I also found out that we use 4 different versions of shale-test in > tomahawk. > > And shale-test-1.0.3 is pulling in the dev.java.net repository. > > > > I now removed all <repositories> from tomcat and until yet it at least > builds > > > fine. > > > > We btw also have a repository.jboss.org repo in myfaces-core. But this > is way > > > better maintained than the dev.java.net > > > > one. > > > > Another point would be to better utilise <dependencyManagement> and > > <pluginManagement>. Is it really necessary to use 3 different > > maven-builder-plugin versions in tomahawk? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Michael Kurz <michi.k...@gmx.at> > > > To: dev@myfaces.apache.org > > > Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 6:00:00 PM > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] getting rid of all java.net maven > repositories > > > > > > Am 19.08.2010 16:58, schrieb Mark Struberg: > > > > I just figured that we still pretty often use the java.net maven > > >repositories. > > > > They are not well maintained and often lead to weird problems. > Today I > >tried > > > > >to > > > > compile tomahawk and got a weird exception that shale-master-1.pom > is > > >broken. > > > > > > Had the same problem some time ago. I think what happened was that > the > > >specified repository location issued a redirect which was, for > whatever > >reason, > > > > >stored in my local pom file! I think what I did then was to manually > >download > > > > >the pom. > > > > > > > Also, if we use Java JSR spec APIs we should always rely on > geronimo spec > > > > >jars > > > > [1] instead of pulling them from the java.net repo! Geronimo spec > jars > >are > > > > always IP cleared which is _not_ guaranteed in the java.net repo. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > We should upgrade tomahawk to myfaces-parent-9 and try to get rid > of > > >arbitrary > > > > <repositories>. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Michi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
