HEy Christian, I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad, which has a similar entry:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml -M On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth <christ...@kaltepoth.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently > preparing our next release. While testing the release in different > environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the > console: > > WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application > configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored > and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into > account instead. > > The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in > our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like > this: > > <ordering> > <before> > <others/> > </before> > </ordering> > > See: > > https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml > > I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning: > > http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982 > > We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it > is a bug in MyFaces. > > http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6 > > What do you think? Is it a bug? > > Christian > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
