[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Concini updated MYFACES-2908:
-------------------------------------
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> UIViewRoot.addComponentResource() adding multiple components with same ID
> instead of replacing
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-2908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2908
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JSR-314
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT
> Reporter: Michael Concini
> Assignee: Michael Concini
> Attachments: MYFACES-2908-patch.txt
>
>
> Looks like when MYFACES-2854 was committed, there were two issues it caused
> where we break spec compliance. Both are around behavior that "If the
> component ID of componentResource matches the the ID of a resource that has
> allready been added, remove the old resource."
> The first is that it looks like the "else if (componentId != null)" statement
> is in the wrong place.
> If a UIComponent is added with the same ID as an existing component, we'll
> never get to this check since we'll be false on the isInView() check.
> This will cause duplicate ID exceptions to be thrown if multiple objects with
> the same ID are added.
> This is easily resolved by moving the else if to kick in whenever isInView()
> is false.
> The second issue, and the more important since this is breaking a TCK test,
> is that since we were only comparing to the parent's ID to the location
> prefix, we weren't handling the case where the same object gets added a
> second time after updating the target.
> This can be resolved by changing
> if (componentResource.getParent() != null &&
> componentResource.getParent().getId() != null &&
>
> componentResource.getParent().getId().startsWith(JAVAX_FACES_LOCATION_PREFIX))
> ...
> to
> if (componentResource.getParent() != null &&
> componentResource.getParent().getId() != null &&
>
> componentResource.getParent().getId().equals(JAVAX_FACES_LOCATION_PREFIX +
> target))
> I'll attach a patch for review while I wait for our CTS team to try the
> change out. I probably wont' be able to commit until after the US Labor Day
> holiday since I'm away Friday.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.