Agreed. I usually don't like numbers in method names, but in this case it's more correct.
/JK On 30 sep. 2010, at 23:04, Martin Koci <martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > there is a disorder in Expression Lauguage names in myfaces core. > Currently myfaces (method > javax.faces.validator._ExternalSpecifications.isUnifiedELAvailable() for > example) output a log: > > "MyFaces Unified EL support enabled" > > But this is a little misleading: there should be "Unified EL 2.2 support > enabled" because it tests presence of EL 2.2. "Unified EL support > enabled" does not make sence at all because JSF use Unified EL as core > technology and that cannot be disabled. > > > There are three major versions of ELs: > > 1) javax.faces.el - old and depreceated > > 2) javax.el 2.0, 2.1 (from JSP 2.0, 2.1) > > 3) javax.el 2.2 from JSP 2.2, part of Java EE 6, EL with method > invocations > > > Suggestions: > Rename isUnifiedELAvailable to isUnifiedEL22Available, > TagValueExpressionUEL to TagValueExpressionUEL22 and so on. > For EL 2.3 (not released yet) we can add similar methods/classes. > > Change log to "MyFaces Unified EL 2.2 support enabled (method > invocations are available)". > > I'll add similiar log "MyFaces Faces EL (javax.faces.el) support > disabled" as part of "disabling "old" technologies" > > WDYT ? > > > Kočičák > > > > > > > > > >
