[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980295#action_12980295
]
Kennard Consulting edited comment on MYFACES-3010 at 1/11/11 2:59 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leronardo,
Thanks for all your time on this.
I am a little concerned because the alternate syntax you propose...
public enum ContactType {
PERSONAL, BUSINESS
}
...is *not* functionally equivalent to the original syntax. Overriding the
toString of an enum is legitimate, as is adding new methods to the enum if the
developer chooses. I agree this has the effect of creating an anonymous inner
class that is not .isEnum(), but previous versions of MyFaces have always
supported this?
For example, the test webapp works fine with 2.0.2-api.jar? And MyFaces 1.x and
Mojarra have always worked fine too.
Richard.
was (Author: kennardconsulting):
Leronardo,
Thanks for all your time on this.
I am a little concerned because the alternate syntax you propose is *not*
functionally equivalent to the original syntax. Overriding the toString of an
enum is legitimate, as is adding new methods to the enum if the developer
chooses. I agree this has the effect of creating an anonymous inner class that
is not .isEnum(), but previous versions of MyFaces have always supported this?
For example, the test webapp works fine with 2.0.2-api.jar? And MyFaces 1.x and
Mojarra have always worked fine too.
Richard.
> 2.0.3 REGRESSION: javax.faces.component._ClassUtils.convertToType
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-3010
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3010
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: General
> Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> Reporter: Kennard Consulting
> Assignee: Leonardo Uribe
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.0.4-SNAPSHOT
>
> Attachments: addressbook-faces2.zip
>
>
> Hi guys,
> Thanks again for the great work you do on MyFaces and your fantastic JIRA
> response times!
> I attach a small app that comes from the Metawidget (http://metawidget.org)
> distribution. I had you do MYFACES-2935 for me for MyFaces 2.0.3, and my app
> was working great with the 2.0.3-impl-SNAPSHOT.jar and the 2.0.2-api.jar.
> However now that 2.0.3 is out for real I have tried to upgrade my app, and it
> fails. To reproduce, please:
> 1. Unzip the attached app and deploy as an exploded WAR into Tomcat
> 2. Run Tomcat and hit http://localhost:8080/addressbook-faces2
> 3. In the Type dropdown, choose 'Business' and click Search
> You will see an IllegalArgumentException. Now:
> 4. Stop Tomcat
> 5. Inside the exploded WAR, rename myfaces-api-2.0.2.rename.me to
> myfaces-api-2.0.2.jar (and delete/rename myfaces-api-2.0.3.jar)
> 6. Restart Tomcat and repeat steps 1-3
> This time you will see no such error.
> So something appears to have broken between myfaces-api-2.0.2.jar and
> myfaces-api-2.0.3.jar? Hopefully you can reproduce this and it is enough for
> you to debug the issue. The source code for the small app can be viewed here:
> http://metawidget.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/metawidget/trunk/examples/src/java/org/metawidget/example/faces/addressbook/
> http://metawidget.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/metawidget/trunk/examples/src/java/org/metawidget/example/shared/addressbook/
> Of course, this could well be a case of 2.0.3 being stricter about something
> and therefore exposing a bug in my code. But my code worked in 2.0.2, JSF 1.2
> and JSF 1.1, so hopefully not!
> Regards,
> Richard
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
