With a similar issue in one of my projects, related to the slightly different version range resolution with maven 2 and 3 I just came across this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html#Maven3.xandsiteplugin-Usingmavensiteplugin2.xwithMaven2.xandmavensiteplugin3.xwithMaven3.x <https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html#Maven3.xandsiteplugin-Usingmavensiteplugin2.xwithMaven2.xandmavensiteplugin3.xwithMaven3.x>You can use that hack to do one thing if you have maven 3 or another if you have maven 2... Cheers, Bruno On 27 January 2011 15:15, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > mvn site works locally (I changed the site plugin version). > Trinidad Tagdoc, JavaDoc, RAT, Findbugs => all work (at least locally > on my Ubuntu box) > > -M > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > How is the entire reporting secion doing, the last time I did a deep > check > > maven3 did not have the reporting anymore and the new external modules > were > > under development. > > > > Werner > > > > > > Am 27.01.11 07:16, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for > >> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]). > >> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I > >> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson > >> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2). > >> > >> However we can simply test that. > >> > >> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...) > >> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future? > >> > >> Greetings, > >> Matthias > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006 > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >