Sounds good.  Thanks.

+1 with minor typo corrections in comments.


/**
* Interface for exceptions that tells whether the exception needs to be reported. * If an exception is thrown during the JSF _lifecycle and already_ reported, then
 * it should let JSF know not to report it again.
 *
 */

On 2/16/2011 4:45 PM, Blake Sullivan wrote:
The issue isn't that the problem has been handled by the model. It hasn't. Therefore the model has to throw a RuntimeException in this case so that the component knows to preserve its local value. That's all good.

The problem occurs if the model has its own mechanisms for reporting problems. In that case, we want to avoid reporting the same problem twice and that is where the interface comes in. The model wants to tell the view that there was a problem, but that the model will take care of reporting it, so the view needn't bother.

-- Blake Sullivan

On 2/16/11 4:39 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
If this exception is handled, why is it rethrown?  What would you
expect Trinidad to do in this case?

On Feb 16, 2011, at 5:37 PM, Hongbing<hongbing.w...@oracle.com>  wrote:

Hi Scott:
One example is in the following UIXEditableValue.updateModel(FacesContext context) code,

  public void updateModel(FacesContext context)
  {
    ....
    try
    {
      Object localValue = getLocalValue();
      expression.setValue(context.getELContext(), localValue);
      setValue(null);
      setLocalValueSet(false);
      if (_LOG.isFiner())
      {
        _LOG.finer("Wrote value {0} to model {1} in component {2}",
                   new Object[]{localValue,
                                expression.getExpressionString(),
                                this});
      }
    }
    catch (RuntimeException e)
    {
    ...

expression.setValue(context.getELContext(), localValue) calls binding code and then the model's code, where exception can be thrown. In the catch part, we want to skip reporting the exception if it is handled by model/controller code.


Thanks,
Hongbing



On 2/16/2011 4:23 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hogbing,

I'm taking a look at the bug now but just so I understand..  When you
refer to JSF, I assume you mean the Trinidad renderkit.  Is that
correct?

Scott

On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Hongbing<hongbing.w...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hi Pavitra:
It can happen in update model phase. For example, Model layer throws exception when attribute value validation fails, binding layer detects it and re-throwd new exception with the new interface to JSF. JSF then can handle it accordingly.

thanks,
Hongbing

On 2/16/2011 2:09 PM, Pavitra Subramaniam wrote:
Hello Hongbing,

You mentioned that exceptions get thrown by model layer outside of JSF. Can you give an e.g., of when this might occur?
How exactly will the interface get used?

Thanks
Pavitra



On 2/16/2011 1:01 PM, Hongbing wrote:
Hi:
This is for JIRA TRINIDAD-2038, please let me know your suggestion.

There are cases that exception is thrown in update model phase, like model layer validation failure, by model outside of JSF and the exception is also handled and reported outside of JSF. To avoid the component's local value getting reset to null, JSF needs to be notified when it happens. The proposed solution is to re-throw a special exception to JSF to notify it and also let JSF know whether it needs to report the exception.

Here is the interface of the exception:
package org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context;

/**
* Interface for exceptions that tells whether the exception needs to be reported. * If an exception is thrown during JSF lifycycle and aleady reported, then it should let
* JSF know not to report it again.
*
*/
public interface Reportable
{

  /**
* Return false if JSF doesn't need to report this exception, otherwise true.
   */
  public boolean isReportingMessage();

}

Thanks,
Hongbing



Reply via email to