Hi 2011/5/9 Martin Koci <martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I see one big issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3117 > That may require a change in server state management, so I suggest solve > it before first 2.1 release
Just for information the issue title is this: MYFACES-3117 Current server state saving implementation prevents multi-window usage In my understanding, the current implementation was made taking into account the back button. So, if an user navigates from one view to another one and goes back, the state will be restored. @Martin Koci: Could you open a thread on myfaces dev list, so we can discuss this one properly? This issue is not easy to understand, but it is very important and deserves a full discussion with myfaces community. > > Another one is a big performance improvement: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3130 that needs > discussion. > @Martin Koci: Could you open a thread on myfaces dev list, so we can discuss this one properly too? In theory, it is ok to use iteration using indices instead call for an iterator for components. In this case we are supposing an implementation detail about UIComponent, but I can imagine someone overriding this stuff and using other structure different to ArrayList. I would like to have a list about the tasks we need to do to enhance myfaces core performance, to take concrete actions and make myfaces even better. regards, Leonardo Uribe > > Regards, > > Kočičák > > Leonardo Uribe píše v Pá 06. 05. 2011 v 11:48 -0500: >> Hi >> >> It could be good to do a release of myfaces core 2.0.5 and 2.1.0-rc in >> 1 or 2 weeks. >> >> The code for myfaces core 2.1.x (actually in trunk) is ready, all >> features specified by >> the spec were implemented. So to keep things moving and get some >> feedback, I think >> it could be good to do a release, so people can give a try. >> >> After that, it could be good to do a release of tomahawk too (1.1.11). >> Most of the issues >> planned for this release were already solved, and the only thing left >> is do a cleanup for >> sandbox for jsf 2.0. >> >> If you have some issues that needs to be included in these releases, >> it is a good >> time to say it. >> >> best regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> > > >
