+1 Good idea!
/JK Op 7 jul. 2011 19:42 schreef "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> het volgende: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2011/7/7 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> > >> Hi >> >> +1, sounds good. Since it is an internal module that shouldn't and >> can't be used in a independent way, change its group-id is not a >> problem. >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2011/7/7 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com>: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > About a year ago we introduced the myfaces-impl-ee6 module, which >> > includes the servlet 3.0 related stuff for myfaces-impl. This means >> > the module is only needed for development reasons and will be shaded >> > into myfaces-impl anyway. >> > >> > However, I noticed that some developers who are not that familiar with >> > MyFaces core don't know what to do with myfaces-impl-ee6. Some even >> > think this is the replacement of myfaces-impl when using java ee 6, >> > which is - of course - complete nonsense. >> > >> > Thus I would like to propose to change the groupId of myfaces-impl-ee6 >> > from org.apache.myfaces.core to org.apache.myfaces.core.internal. IMO >> > this makes it a lot more clear that this module is for internal >> > purposes only! >> > >> > Any objections, better ideas? >> > >> > Regards, >> > Jakob >> > >> > -- >> > Jakob Korherr >> > >> > blog: http://www.jakobk.com >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr >> > work: http://www.irian.at >> > >>
