Hi Kito MyFaces Core 2.0.12 has the same improvements. All improvements done has been applied on both branches, even if that means some overhead associated. Compared with 2.0.11/2.1.5, the diference is significant.
regards, Leonardo Uribe 2012/2/9 Kito Mann <kito.m...@virtua.com>: > Leonardo, does 2.0.6 share the same memory consumption improvements? > ___ > > Kito D. Mann | twitter: kito99 | Author, JSF in Action > Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and consulting > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info | twitter: > jsfcentral > +1 203-404-4848 x3 > > * Listen to the latest headlines in the JSF and Java EE > newscast: http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/roller/editorsdesk/category/JSF+and+Java+EE+Newscast > * Sign up for the JSFCentral newsletter: http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Some days ago Thomas Andraschko told on users list that he already >> have a variant of this for MyFaces. Look the mail with subject: >> >> "Weird PlexusContainer object in ViewRoot" >> >> I think it is a good idea to put that code in myfaces commons or as an >> extension (extensions/stateless-jsf ?). Since the license of the code >> is ASL, it is possible to host it here. To make this possible I think >> we should vote about create a module. >> >> @Thomas: could you create an issue on myfaces issue tracker: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES >> >> and attach the code you are working on, so the PMC can vote if it is >> worth to create the subproject? >> >> About performance of MyFaces code vs Mojarra: I think with the latest >> changes MyFaces code looks very good. Yes, there is a lot of room from >> improvement. I think it is possible to do things like trim spaces in >> facelets compiler, remove <!-- --> on the scripts (it is there because >> very early versions of MyFaces do that), or optimize js rendering >> using some myfaces specific code instead call javax.faces js api. But >> note recent optimization in myfaces renderers has been improved its >> base speed. If you exclude the javascript rendering part, MyFaces >> renderers looks good. >> >> I think we should let those optimizations for 2.2. The only thing left >> to start working on that branch is reorganize shared modules (split >> shared in two, cleanup and maybe create myfaces-impl-api submodule to >> hold stuff like spi interfaces and other myfaces-impl api to be used >> for integration points). >> >> Right now, MyFaces 2.1.6 uses a lot less memory, and recent >> improvements into its PSS algorithm has reduced the required state >> size for views, making it very efficient. >> >> regards, >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2012/2/9 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>: >> > Hia just a general discussion, regarding performance. One of the big >> > performance impacts is statefulness, now there has been a project >> > >> > >> > http://industrieit.com/blog/2011/11/stateless-jsf-high-performance-zero-per-request-memory-overhead/ >> > >> > This however is only for Mojarra, shouldnt we target something similar, >> > one >> > day or the other it will be part of the spec, so targetting this early >> > might >> > give the mojarra guys a push for going there also. >> > >> > If you look at the numbers you can see there is a lot to gain by being >> > able >> > to render pages stateless one way or the other. >> > I personally think in the typical extranet site, most pages are able to >> > go >> > stateless and about 5-10% should be stateful, that way we could cover >> > both. >> > >> > Another performance issue I still have gripes with is the rendered code. >> > For a small page we on the average still have way more code rendered >> > than >> > Mojarra, in some cases up to 40%. Which is a lot. >> > >> > While we already did some work regarding our onclick event javascript >> > calls, >> > there is still lots of room for optimization in our code. >> > For instance we render <!-- --> with all linebreaks and spaces between >> > link >> > and script tags intact. >> > >> > Mojarra basically strips all unneeded stuff and renders only the script >> > and >> > link tags without any blanks. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Werner >> > > >
