+1 Change the release process is a pain, but I agree there are some benefits moving to git.
But when I see here: https://github.com/apache/myfaces It says: mirrored from git://git.apache.org/myfaces.git But I have never checked where that file is or how to change it. Looking in deltaspike, the svn repo only has the site (for the CMS) and the source code lives on git. If that so, we still need the svn, so I agree it is a good idea to move only some subprojects to git. regards, Leonardo Uribe <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> 2017-04-17 11:40 GMT-05:00 Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Couldn't agree more. > > Grant Smith - V.P. Information Technology > Marathon Computer Systems, LLC. > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> > wrote: > >> From my side a big >> >> +1 >> >> I'm still happy with subversion but for others the collaboration is >> easier and the project visibility a little bit better. >> >> Regards >> >> Bernd >> >> Am 13.04.2017 09:41 schrieb "Thomas Andraschko" < >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: >> >>> +0 >>> I usually just work on MF core and there it doesn't make much difference. >>> >>> 2017-04-13 8:57 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <m...@dekies.de>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> have you ever thought of migrating to Git? I see more and more Apache >>>> projects moving. In the past SVN or Git didn't make any difference to me >>>> but now I'm thinking that as an Open Source project you need to be >>>> present on GitHub to get Pull Requests from the community. It's much >>>> more fun contributing there than attaching patches to JIRA issues. >>>> >>>> We could start with Trinidad and Tobago to avoid conflicts with the 2.3 >>>> release. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Dennis >>>> >>> >>> >
