Did you checked the spec texts? 2017-11-17 19:56 GMT+01:00 Paul Nicolucci <[email protected]>:
> Hello, > > I was testing out the ResourceHandler.getViewResources() today and I > noticed that we have quite a behavior different between the two > implementations. > > Take the following application for example: > > testApplication > - /depth2/index.xhtml > -META-INF/index.xhtml > -WEB-INF/index.xhtml > - index.xhtml > - test > > Mojarra getViewResources( call with ResourceVisitOptions ) > /index.xhtml /depth2/index.xhtml > > Mojarra getViewResources ( call without ResourceVisitOptions ) > /index.xhtml /depth2/index.xhtml META-INF/index.xhtml WEB-INF/index.xhtml > > MyFaces getViewResources( call with ResourceVisitOptions ) > /index.xhtml /depth2/index.xhtml > > MyFaces getViewResources( call without ResourceVisitOptions ) > /index.xhtml /test /depth2/index.xhtml > > In MyFaces if we use the ResourceVisitOptions then we filter out any views > that don't contain a valid suffix ( in the above case /test ). In addition > MyFaces never returns any views in WEB-INF and META-INF > > In Mojarra if we use the ResourceVisitOptions then anything in WEB-INF and > META-INF is not included. In addition Mojarra never returns any views > without a valid suffix. > > I think we need a dev discussion to determine if we want to stick with our > current behavior or change it. > > Thanks, > > Paul Nicolucci >
