Yep thats true. It was just an idea to minimize required projects. 2018-04-12 10:50 GMT+02:00 Udo Schnurpfeil <lof...@apache.org>:
> When you only have the examples folder, it can't work. > > About MyFaces-Core: you will need a copy for each version of MyFaces > 2.0, 2.1, 2.2., 2.3. > > Nevertheless, I see no reason to restructure the build process only for > a git migration. > > Regards, > > Udo > > Am 12.04.18 um 10:33 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > > It works fine for my personal projects. > > > > /myfaces-tobago/pom.xml > > /myfaces-tobago/checkstyle.xml > > /myfaces-tobago/examples/pom.xml > > /myfaces-tobago/examples/.... > > > > The examples pom inherit from the root pom and the root pom's checkstyle > > plugin has: > > > > <configLocation>checkstyle.xml</configLocation> > > > > > > No problem to build only the examples. > > > > > > 2018-04-12 10:24 GMT+02:00 Udo Schnurpfeil <lof...@apache.org > > <mailto:lof...@apache.org>>: > > > > Sorry for wrong addressing... > > > > The maven-checkstyle-plugin and dependency-check-maven CAN load the > > configuration from the file system. But when you do that, it's no > longer > > possible to build only a sub-module, e.g. an example. That's the > reason > > why these configuration in a Maven artifact. "It's just available". > > > > Regards, > > Udo > > > > Am 12.04.18 um 10:12 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > > > Hi Udo, you only sent it to me, now adding dev@myfaces. > > > > > > > > > What do you mean exactly? > > > This are just checkstyle files, which can be placed inside tobago > itself. > > > e.g. > > > /myfaces-tobago/pom.xml > > > /myfaces-tobago/checkstyle.xml > > > > > > there is no need to give the checkstyle a own project, it coudl be > just > > > a project file. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-04-12 10:08 GMT+02:00 Udo Schnurpfeil <lof...@apache.org > <mailto:lof...@apache.org> > > > <mailto:lof...@apache.org <mailto:lof...@apache.org>>>: > > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > I've checked how to put the tobago-checkstyle stuff inside of > > > Tobago. The easy way (with 1 release cycle) will not work, > because > > > in that case we will have cyclic dependencies. > > > > > > The other way would be: Having 2 release numbers and 2 > releases. But > > > in that case we have no advantage. The number of releases and > votes > > > are the same. > > > > > > We shouldn't mix the git migration too much with project > refactoring. > > > > > > > > > What's about /keys and /myfaces-site-skins > > > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-site-skins/ > > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-site-skins/>>? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Udo > > > > > > > > > Am 12.04.18 um 09:50 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > > >> We should really think about it we need to migrate > > >> myfaces-build-tools. > > >> The only active stuff maintained here is the checkstyle, we > can be > > >> simply moved the projects. > > >> > > >> Extensions is also.... ExtVal and CODI are not maintained, > only > > >> ExtScripting got a small update this year. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 2018-04-12 8:47 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org > <mailto:d...@apache.org> > > >> <mailto:d...@apache.org <mailto:d...@apache.org>>>: > > >> > > >> Yes, everything is working. It's good idea to do the > migration. > > >> > > >> As far as I can see we need the following repos: > > >> myfaces (for myfaces-core, already exists as old mirror > > >> https://github.com/apache/myfaces < > https://github.com/apache/myfaces> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/myfaces > > <https://github.com/apache/myfaces>>) > > >> myfaces-master-pom > > >> myfaces-build-tools > > >> myfaces-extensions > > >> myfaces-test > > >> > > >> The other stuff has not been updated for over a year > > >> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/?sortby=date > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/?sortby=date> > > >> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/?sortby=date > > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/?sortby=date>>) so looks > > >> like no need to migrate it?! > > >> > > >> Is anyone willing to do further cleanup? > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> Dennis > > >> > > >> On 2018/04/11 18:37:23, Thomas Andraschko > > >> <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com <mailto:andraschko.thomas@ > gmail.com> > > >> <mailto:andraschko.tho...@gmail.com <mailto: > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>>> > > wrote: > > >> > Is everything fine now for tobago and trinidad? > > >> > > > >> > +1 for migrating core now as 2.3.0 is out, maybe we > have to > > >> wait for 2.3.1 > > >> > > > >> > we could also do a bit a cleanup and only migrate the > active > > >> projects > > >> > We must also check e.g. the maven plugins and master > poms... > > >> > E.g. we could remove the checkstyle files and move them > to > > >> the tobago and > > >> > core itself instead maintain a projects which contains > both... > > >> > > > >> > It think it would be the right momemt to do a cleanup > now, > > >> to make it > > >> > easier to maintain in the future. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2017-09-17 20:16 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst > > >> <d...@apache.org <mailto:d...@apache.org> > > <mailto:d...@apache.org <mailto:d...@apache.org>>>: > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/ > > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/> > > >> <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/ > > <https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad-maven/>> has > > >> not been > > >> > > > migrated yet, I've requested a new repo for it. > > >> > > Migration of trinidad-maven is finished: > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/myfaces-trinidad-maven > > <https://github.com/apache/myfaces-trinidad-maven> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/myfaces-trinidad-maven > > <https://github.com/apache/myfaces-trinidad-maven>> or > > >> > > > > >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=myfaces-trinidad- > maven.git > > <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=myfaces-trinidad-maven.git> > > >> > > <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=myfaces-trinidad-maven.git > > <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=myfaces-trinidad-maven.git>> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >