Perfect!

Melloware
@melloware on GitHub

> On May 23, 2023, at 3:12 PM, Volodymyr Siedlecki <volos...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Turns out these failures were infrastructure related.  Manual tests show that 
> they pass.
> 
> I'll change vote to a +1.
> 
> If no objections, I'll release 4.0.1 tomorrow? 
> 
> Best,
> Volodymyr 
> 
>> On 2023/05/22 13:39:11 Volodymyr Siedlecki via dev wrote:
>> Hey Thomas,
>> 
>> Yes, the TCK tests were passing previously on 4.0.0.   I haven’t 
>> investigated into the root causes yet, but I’ll look soon.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Volodymyr
>> 
>> From: Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Monday, May 22, 2023 at 4:05 AM
>> To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release of MyFaces Core 4.0.1
>> and they are working on 4. 0. 0? Am So. , 21. Mai 2023 um 03: 23 Uhr schrieb 
>> Volodymyr Siedlecki <volosied@ apache. org>: Sorry, I linked the classes, 
>> not the tests. Here are the 7 failing tests (from the old tck): com. sun. 
>> ts. tests. jsf. spec. appconfigresources. absolute_ordering. URLClient
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
>> You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>> and they are working on 4.0.0?
>> 
>> Am So., 21. Mai 2023 um 03:23 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki 
>> <volos...@apache.org<mailto:volos...@apache.org>>:
>> Sorry, I linked the classes, not the tests. Here are the 7 failing tests 
>> (from the old tck):
>> 
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.absolute_ordering.URLClient
>> - testDocumentAbsoluteOrdering
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.relative_ordering.URLClient
>> - testDocumentRelativeOrderingTest1
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.startupbehavior.URLClient
>> - applicationConfigurationfilesTest1
>> - applicationConfigurationfilesTest2
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.composite.insertchildren.URLClient
>> - compositeRenderUsingPageChildrenTagTest
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.selectitems.URLClient
>> - selectItemsValueTest
>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.viewaction.URLClient
>> - viewActionTest
>> 
>>> On 2023/05/21 01:18:57 Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
>>> -1 for me.  TCK results finally got back (sorry for the delay) and we have 
>>> failures for the following tests:
>>> 
>>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.absolute_ordering.URLClient
>>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.relative_ordering.URLClient
>>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.appconfigresources.startupbehavior.URLClient
>>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.composite.insertchildren.URLClient
>>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.selectitems.URLClient
>>> com.sun.ts.tests.jsf.spec.coretags.viewaction.URLClient
>>> 
>>> I will need to investigate them.
>>> 
>>> On 2023/05/18 00:41:36 Thomas Andraschko wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> Melloware <melloware...@gmail.com<mailto:melloware...@gmail.com>> schrieb 
>>>> am Mi., 17. Mai 2023, 22:11:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 5/17/2023 3:52 PM, Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 4.0.1 release of Apache
>>>>>> MyFaces core out.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
>>>>>>   1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v4.0.1  [1]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The artifacts were deployed on nexus repo [1] for binary and source
>>>>>> packages.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The release notes could be found at [4].
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The japicmp tool shows no binary incompatibilities with 4.0.1 when
>>>>>> compared to the previous 4.0.0 jar. Please take a look at the attached
>>>>>> results.html.
>>>>>> If requested, I can provide a comparison to the Jakarta Faces 4.0.1 API.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This release has not yet been run against the TCK, but I am working to
>>>>>> create a build which will run against the TCK. I hope to have results
>>>>>> by May 19.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please take a look at the "4.0.1" artifacts and vote! (see [3])
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
>>>>>> +1 votes (see [2]).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>>> released, and why.
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Volodymyr
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/>
>>>>>> [2] 
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes<http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-core-assembly/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-1231/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-core-assembly/>
>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>> 
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978>
>>>>>> <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&version=12352978>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Melloware
>>>>> melloware@
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to