[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17927246#comment-17927246
]
Volodymyr Siedlecki edited comment on MYFACES-4706 at 2/14/25 7:19 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think we should rule out EE9 completely – 14% of users are on EE9 -
[https://jakarta.ee/blogs/2024-cloud-native-java-survey-findings/]
I'll still make a 3.0.3 release out later this year – we've placed effort into
back-porting issues. Hate for that to go to waste.
Another way to look at it: ~40-45% are on EE8 or later. They're slow to
migrate, so they'll likely use EE9 as a stepping stone.
was (Author: volosied):
I don't think we should rule out EE9 completely – 14% of users are on EE9 -
[https://jakarta.ee/blogs/2024-cloud-native-java-survey-findings/]
I'll still make a 3.0.3 release out later this year – we've placed effort into
back-porting issues. Hate for that to go to waste.
> Sync jsf.js code between 2.3 and 3.0
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4706
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2
> Reporter: Volodymyr Siedlecki
> Assignee: Werner Punz
> Priority: Major
>
> MYFACES-4522 synced up the javascript code between 2.3 and 2.3-next.
> However, 2.3 and 3.0 branches are basically the same. Therefore, the changes
> to 2.3 should be applied to 3.0. Support-wise, it would be easier since
> they would share the same code base.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
