[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17937929#comment-17937929
]
Volodymyr Siedlecki commented on MYFACES-4641:
----------------------------------------------
[~tandraschko] Is this proper formatting?
{code:java}
jakarta.el;version="[4.0.0, 5.0.0, 6.0.0)",
jakarta.servlet;version="[5.0.0, 6.0.0, 7.0.0)",{code}
Shouldn't it just be
{code:java}
jakarta.el;version="[4.0.0,6.0.0)",
jakarta.servlet;version="[5.0.0,7.0.0)",{code}
Should we bump the jakarta.el import to support 6.0.0 (EE11)? So
"[4.0.0,7.0.0)"?
> MyFaces bundle MANIFEST file contains "jakarta.servlet.*;version="[3,5)"
> imports
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4641
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4641
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0.2
> Reporter: Maxime Leur
> Assignee: Thomas Andraschko
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.3
>
>
> Hi,
> In MyFaces web site, version "3.0.x" is supposed to be compatible with:
> * Java 1.8
> * Servlet 5.0
> * EL 4.0
> * CDI 3.0 (optional)
> * JSTL 2.0 (optional)
> * BV 2.0 (optional)
> But I see that in "MyFaces bundle" the MANIFEST file contains
> "jakarta.servlet.*;version="[3,5)" imports:
> {noformat}
> jakarta.servlet.annotation;version="[3,5)";resolution:=optional
> jakarta.servlet.http;version="[3,5)"
> jakarta.servlet.jsp.jstl.core;version="[1.1.2,2.0.0)"
> jakarta.servlet.jsp.jstl.sql
> jakarta.servlet.jsp.tagext;version="[2.1.0,3.1)"
> jakarta.servlet.jsp;version="[2.1.0,3.1)"
> jakarta.servlet;version="[3,5)"
> {noformat}
> So it seems not compatible on OSGI environment with "Servlet 5.0".
> Regards,
> Maxime
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
