So, when is a decision going to be made?
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018, at 11:15 AM, Miguel Azevedo wrote: > +1 > > I strongly agree to track issues on github, the integration with > github issues and PRs is very good and there's a lot of people already > using it on other projects. > Thanks, > > Miguel > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Fabio Utzig <ut...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > > > > I prefer as much information in a single place as possible, and GH as been > > adding more and more "project management" features making it better suited > > as a Jira alternative (and btw, we already made this move with MCUBoot!). > > > > Cheers, > > Fabio Utzig > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018, at 2:27 PM, Christopher Collins wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 12:26:17AM -0800, aditi hilbert wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Multiple people have suggested that issues be tracked on Github close > >> > to the code. The benefit is that contributors don’t have to switch > >> > between two systems to raise and clear issues. Please let your > >> > thoughts known either way. > >> > >> I agree with switching to github issues. > >> > >> Jira seems more powerful and I do like it, but I find the extra > >> flexibility is outweighed by the difficulty of using two different > >> systems (github for PRs, Jira for issues). > >> > >> Chris > > > > -- > -- > Miguel Azevedo
