On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:47:34PM +0300, marko kiiskila wrote: > > On Aug 30, 2018, at 7:21 PM, Christopher Collins <ch...@runtime.io> wrote: > > [1] We should do the same for the other HAL APIs (i.e., non-I2C), but > > that can come later. > > Not sure this makes sense for other ones, as i2c is the only one with > ACK.
Perhaps we don't need dedicated status code for the other APIs, but I think we want to make sure the implementations don't return MCU-specific errors. Chris
