Hi Marc, On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 09:59, Marc BT <bt_m...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Hi Łukasz, > > Thanks for quick reply and a quick update. > > I followed the guideline ...got a bit confused on the logging of the rtt2pty > tool: > ../tools-rtt2pty/rtt2pty -b btmonitor > Using jlinkarm found at /opt/SEGGER/JLink/libjlinkarm.so > Connected to: > J-Link OB-SAM3U128-V2-NordicSemi compiled Jul 12 2018 11:44:41 > S/N: 683623237 > Searching for RTT control block... > Failed to find matching up-buffer >
That would mean BLE_MONITOR_RTT: 1 is not set as in the tutorial. Could you please double check, rebuild, flash and try one more time? > Running it without the -b btmonitor I could get a pty port. > > Monitoring showed some logging, not like the one from the codecoup btmon link > but a starting point. > > 021819 Extended adv: 'conn' incomplete rssi=-60 txpower=127, pphy=1, sphy=1, > sid=10, addr_type=0 addr=66:55:44:33:22:11 > 021822 length_data=229 > data=0x19:0x09:0x48:0x65:0x6c:0x6c:0x6f:0x2c:0x20:0x49:0x27:0x6d:0x20:0x61:0x64:0x76:0x65:0x72:0x74:0x69:0x7 > .... > 021853 Extended adv: 'conn' complete rssi=-60 txpower=127, pphy=1, sphy=1, > sid=10, addr_type=0 addr=66:55:44:33:22:11 > 021856 length_data=15 > data=0x69:0x6e:0x67:0x20:0x39:0x19:0x09:0x48:0x65:0x6c:0x6c:0x6f:0x2c:0x20:0x49 > fields: > 021859 > 021859 Extended adv: 'conn' incomplete rssi=-53 txpower=127, pphy=1, sphy=1, > sid=10, addr_type=0 addr=66:55:44:33:22:11 > 021862 length_data=229 > data=0x19:0x09:0x48:0x65:0x6c:0x6c:0x6f:0x2c:0x20:0x49:0x27:0x6d:0x20:0x61:0x64:0x76:0x65:0x72:0x74:0x69:0x7 > .... > .... > 021861 received advertisement; event_type=4 rssi=-82 addr_type=1 > addr=f1:80:b4:61:d2:c6 length_data=29 > data=0x02:0x0a:0x04:0x19:0x09:0x45:0x78:0x70:0x65:0x72:0x74:0x26:0x4d:0x69:0x6c:0x6b:0x5f:0x46:0x31:0x38:0x30:0x42:0x34:0x36:0x31:0x44:0x32:0x43:0x35 > fields: > 021868 name(complete)=Expert&Milk_F180B461D2C5 > 021869 tx_pwr_lvl=4 > > Time to start further debugging > Note that printing lot of data on the console might break your scanning, especially long chaining. Have a look at command `set-scan-opts` which can help you to limit number of bytes to print out. Also there is an option to filter out legacy advertising. > Thank, > Marc Best Łukasz > > >Hello Marc, > > > >There is no additional configuration needed as long as you are using 1M PHY. > >Would be good to get some logs and best would be to have btmon logs: > >https://www.codecoup.pl/blog/support-for-btmon-in-mynewt/ > > > >Best > >Łukasz > >>On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 12:29, Marc BT <bt_m...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello all, > >> > >> I'm trying to configure two Nordic nRF52840-DK boards, one as advertiser > >> (Extended Advertise), > the other as scanner (Extended Scan). > >> > >> Compile settings (newt target amend ....): > >> > >> * BLE_EXT_ADV = 1 > >> * BLE_EXT_ADV_MAX_SIZE = 700 > >> > >> I've used a TI kit to verify the existence of Extended Advertising. > >> > >> The board configured as Extended Advertiser works, the advertising > >> packets can be seen > on the TI board. > >> The board configured as Extended Scanner doesn't return any advertising > >> events. > >> > >> The HCI commands to setup the Extended Scan don't return any status error. > >> > >> Am I missing some compile switches ? > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Marc > > ________________________________ > From: Marc BT > Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 12:13 PM > To: dev@mynewt.apache.org > Subject: NimBLE Extended Scan > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to configure two Nordic nRF52840-DK boards, one as advertiser > (Extended Advertise), the other as scanner (Extended Scan). > > Compile settings (newt target amend ....): > > * BLE_EXT_ADV = 1 > * BLE_EXT_ADV_MAX_SIZE = 700 > > I've used a TI kit to verify the existence of Extended Advertising. > > The board configured as Extended Advertiser works, the advertising packets > can be seen on the TI board. > The board configured as Extended Scanner doesn't return any advertising > events. > > The HCI commands to setup the Extended Scan don't return any status error. > > Am I missing some compile switches ? > > Kind regards, > Marc
