There should be a line between what is stored in state store and what is stored in ZK (if it is not a state store), as we would need ot maintain two systems of record in such a case. Definitely ZK has such advantages as "triggers" and MyriadScheduler can find out instantly if something was changed/removed/deleted and in case of multiple MyriadSchedulers running it would be an advantage. I just don't think we would have such a situation where we have multiple MyriadSchedulers acting as masters. and BTW - those comments do not get on the JIRA, so we better continue conversation on the JIRA.
From: John Omernik <j...@omernik.com> To: dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (MYRIAD-129) Creating custom profiles requires configurations changes on all nodes. Since the profile information is small, could this be done in Zookeeper? On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Yuliya Feldman (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYRIAD-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14735288#comment-14735288 > ] > > Yuliya Feldman commented on MYRIAD-129: > --------------------------------------- > > I think we should have API/UI to add/remove/modify profiles. Also keep all > the configuration updates in state store in case of failover > > > Creating custom profiles requires configurations changes on all nodes. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: MYRIAD-129 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYRIAD-129 > > Project: Myriad > > Issue Type: Bug > > Reporter: Aashreya Ravi Shankar > > > > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332) >