John McCreesh wrote: > Exactly. The model we propose for the Marketing Project and NL-Projects > is equally applicable to any project. The core project works in the > English language and acts as a clearing house / repository of best > practice / co-ordination point etc for worldwide project activity - see > the diagram at the bottom of > http://ooosmp.homelinux.org/GoalsandObjectives/MarketingProject
Why make it harder for English? The MP doesn't organize conferences for Romania, or design flyers for Japanese (since you brought up the example of MP). Why should it treat English differently? I think there should be an English project that can focus on grassroots efforts for English. Separate from the global things that happen at MP. I think it's counter productive to mix together global tasks, and local ones. They are different, and should go through different purposes. For example, it might make sense to have a community-wide vote on the SMP, or the OOo logo, or any global marketing strategy. But it doesn't make sense to have a similar process for a conference in Spain. If you had such a system, it would be totally unefficient. This is what's happening with English right now. You have a system that might make sense for designing a global brand image, and then apply it for tasks that aren't global. The slowness and the bureocracy of the MP project might be acceptable when designing a global task, but they are a real hinderance when you apply it to anything that is done in English. I don't see why English should get the short end of the stick like this. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
