On 2/25/10, Charles-H. Schulz <charles-h.sch...@laposte.net> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Yes I did. I don't find it satisfactory, for three reasons. > > 1) as mh wrote on the issue as an answer to you, there was ample times > and several RCs where l10n specific issues were raised, so how come your > > issue(s) were not raised? > > How you know we didn't look at issue > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=108563 > > 2) If the bugfix is scheduled for the 3.2.1 then wait for the 3.2.1. I'm > sure that there are other bugs, l10n specific or not, but there is also > > a release process and schedules, so please follow them. > > I dont think I need to wait. As QA release lead for ES, I would have not > approve a build with such issues, and would have probably wait for 3.2.1 all > together skipping the 3.2 cycle. Fortunately this patches where accepted on > Pavel's build so we release this. > > 3) Last but not least, we have a situation now where we have two sources > > for spanish builds. We have the vanilla one and the ones from Pavel. > > If what 108563 happens, and take the patches from Pootle then it shouldnt > be any difference. > This calls for one selection of one source the need to stick to it. You > may, on the other hand have good reasons to distribute Pavel's builds, > but then please state your reasons so that at least there is no > > duplication of effort. In any case, it's about coherence. > > No is about responsiveness, if builders decide to drop our issues as > showstoppers and move to a different cycle, then we are also able to move to > a different tree whenever we think this is trully a stopper for a release. > > Best, > Charles. > > Le 24/02/10 20:06, Alexandro Colorado a écrit : > > > Did you read my response in the bug? > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Charles-H. Schulz > > <charles-h.sch...@laposte.net> wrote: > > > > Hello Alexandro, all, > > > > It has come to my attention > > (http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109060 > > <http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109060>) that the > ES > > project is now proposing non vanilla builds (Pavel's builds) instead > of > > the regular ones. I'm fine with Pavel's builds, but they are usually > > not used when a vanilla version is available. > > > > Would you like to explain why the project chose this option? > > > > Thank you, > > Charles. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@native-lang.openoffice.org > > > <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@native-lang.openoffice.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@native-lang.openoffice.org > > > <mailto:dev-h...@native-lang.openoffice.org> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > OpenOffice.org Español > > IM: j...@jabber.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@native-lang.openoffice.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@native-lang.openoffice.org > >
-- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español IM: j...@jabber.org
