On 14/05/2010 Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > > The migration might change this. I don't know what it will entail, > but perhaps we ought to ask the following question (esp. to Stefan > Taxhet): > > - What about i18n capabilities > > - what about the general features of the kennai platform? > > - will we still be able to customize each project ? > > - in the other case, how flexible will be the common template?
Well, since the migration is now stalled as Stefan pointed out in the thread you cited, the Italian N-L Project will wait for the process to resume before spending energies in discussions that could be totally useless. But your points are valid indeed. > > (Rant: of course we could all have chosen what infrastructure to > choose, but we were not asked about it :-( ) > Short Re to myself: We should be migrating to Kennai but if there are > too many issues we should be able to block it mostly by a combination > of shouts and rational arguments :-) I share your concern and indeed I raised it with proper timing on the appropriate mailing list several months ago: http://website.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=11210 But I saw no reactions so I assume most N-L projects are just going to accept it or to wait that the migration becomes more concrete before commenting. It's still quite hypothetical after all. Regards, Andrea Pescetti - Italian N-L Project Lead. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@native-lang.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@native-lang.openoffice.org
