seojangho commented on a change in pull request #23: [NEMO-67] Fix Communication Pattern for Beam CoGroupByKey transform URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nemo/pull/23#discussion_r191112708
########## File path: compiler/frontend/beam/src/main/java/edu/snu/nemo/compiler/frontend/beam/NemoPipelineVisitor.java ########## @@ -241,6 +241,19 @@ private static BeamCoder getCoderForView(final ViewFn viewFn, final Coder beamIn */ private static DataCommunicationPatternProperty.Value getEdgeCommunicationPattern(final IRVertex src, final IRVertex dst) { + try { + final Class<?> constructUnionTableFn = Class.forName( + "org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.join.CoGroupByKey$ConstructUnionTableFn"); + if (src instanceof OperatorVertex && ((OperatorVertex) src).getTransform() instanceof DoTransform + && ((DoTransform) ((OperatorVertex) src).getTransform()).getDoFn().getClass().equals(constructUnionTableFn)) { + return DataCommunicationPatternProperty.Value.Shuffle; + } + } catch (final ClassNotFoundException e) { + throw new RuntimeException(e); + } + if (src instanceof OperatorVertex && ((OperatorVertex) src).getTransform() instanceof FlattenTransform) { Review comment: ![screenshot from 2018-05-28 14-13-24](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8655816/40598194-533a7b6a-6281-11e8-9b9a-297b5abe7aeb.png) Unfortunately, no. Without that `if` block, the method will return `Shuffle` pattern. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services