On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 19:55, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
> I deeply apologize for not responding, I've missed the e-mail.

No problem!

> Hm, not sure - I did suggest this? It is true this is one way to develop,
> and a similar way was used by NetBeans at some points, but I don't recall
> suggesting this?

There is this email from the original thread on quarterly releases,
which I may be in danger of misinterpreting?!  I went back through
what everyone had said in writing that page, but it's obviously got my
spin on it.

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a97e431227e971ee3f3b7e9583cb9abc7c2baf32739bb37e772ed131@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E

> Anyway, we can try and see how it will work. I guess I'd just like to have
> a branch into which I could be merging stuff, like port-11-1-dev, or alike.

If you feel that's required, and that feature branches won't work,
then I think we should go with what works for you!

One thing i'd like is not to have to cherry pick anything from it to
master for the release, and probably we should merge and delete post
release?  Does that work?

Best wishes,

Neil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to