Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 19.06.2019, 19:56 +0200 schrieb David Schulz: > Makes sense, we could also check some Icon libraries like Streamline > or Icon8 to use them as a base for our icon rework. Not sure how the > apache license works with icon libraries like that, any opinions?
I think this is answered in the legal FAQ: https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#handling-public-domain-licensed-works We should stay inside category A licenses. Everything else will lead to discussions and might pose problems. The less license text/copyright/required notice is present the better. We have to mark all files, that are not plain ALv2/not licensed to the ASF, this might prove to be painful and should be avoided if possible. Maybe there are good base icons in the same spirit as the Tango Desktop Project, which distributed the icons in the public domain. We went that way to replace the npm icon, where the origin project was not willing to release the graphics under an open enough license. HTH Matthias --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
