Not sure if this (as of Java 9) may impact things at some point... http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/182
Eric Bresie ebre...@gmail.com > On July 17, 2019 at 3:43:47 AM CDT, Jan Lahoda <lah...@gmail.com> wrote: > FWIW, I believe there are some corner cases where type inference works > differently under source level 8 compared to source level 7. So my personal > approach so far was to upgrade source level for modules I was modifying and > where I want to use lambdas, as I could more easily see the potential issues > while working on that module. > > Jan > > 17. července 2019 4:18:37 SELČ, Tim Boudreau <niftin...@gmail.com> napsal: > > If you feel like fixing all the build warnings due to code not having > > generics and the like, sure! :-) > > > > This is one of those "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" things. There is > > nothing wrong with source level 1.6 for infrequently modified code > > that's > > stable. If it were undergoing a major rewrite, I would expect the > > author to > > do that sort of thing. But doing it for the sake of aesthetics? Far > > better > > to spend time on actual features and bug fixes than cosmetic changes > > that > > don't affect semantics. It would be an utter waste of time, with the > > real > > risk that accidental semantic changes will be introduced that do break > > things. Don't do it unless the reward is worth the risk and the time > > that > > could be spent doing real work. > > > > -Tim > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:44 PM Brad Walker <bwal...@musings.com> > > wrote: > > > > > We have 417 project.properties files in the git repo.. > > > > > > These seem to be part of a Netbeans project for the various different > > > components. > > > > > > I've noticed the project.properties file contains the following: > > > > > > javac.source=1.6 > > > > > > Should we not think about maybe bumping that to 1.8? > > > > > > -brad w. > > > > > -- > > http://timboudreau.com > > -- > Odesláno z mého telefonu s Androidem pomocí pošty K-9 Mail. Omluvte prosím > moji stručnost.
