Why not,
 If we refactor a bit the table to start with LTS .0 at the beginning we can 
remove release column and add 11.X 12.X ... column and put the link to 
milestone and confluence.
 
 Will make documentation more browsable too.

Best Regards
Eric
 
 
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Eric Bresie <ebre...@gmail.com> 
Envoyé : vendredi 14 février 2020 14:55
À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
Objet : Re: Re: When can we expect to use the C++ plugin, and how can you tell?

For more specific example, on the page for 12 could have references like:

Milestones for 12:
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/milestone/5

Labels for 12
https://github.com/apache/netbeans/labels/NB12.0

And if and when a Pull request is made for 12 that could be regencies as well.

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 7:39 AM Eric Bresie <ebre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Slightly off topic and a little bit of a brain dump on some thoughts 
> around this topic but
>
> On the quarterly release schedule page, is it worth wild to add 
> references to the expected or already released changes in some way?
>
> Maybe add references to github milestone tags, labels, or pr that is 
> the resulting given release or future release?
>
> I think this might benefit to help organize the future expected build, 
> to help monitor progress and allow consistency?  I believe a lot of 
> items are already tagged in some way so why not reference them 
> allowing a little more dynamic as more items are labeled , tagged, or PR are 
> updated.
>
> So for example have a “12.1” milestone / label with a given target 
> features (C/C++) marked (feature can also have a label of some type or 
> some applicable component attribute referenced) for that milestone 
> (assuming its tagged as such), maybe referencing an initial PR which 
> would be updated during pre release work and upon completion finalize the PR).
>
> Eric Bresie
> ebre...@gmail.com
>
> On February 6, 2020 at 11:08:10 AM CST, Neil C Smith < 
> neilcsm...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 14:49, Martin Weißhaupt 
> <mweisshaupt1...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Interesting that you are working on integrating the C/C++ as a native 
> integration. I missed this.
>
>
> That's only replicating the situation up to 8.2?!
>
> The only roadmap I could find was this and it hasn't been updated for 
> some
> time:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+R
> elease+Roadmap
>
>
> Well, we switched to time-based rather than feature-based releases, 
> which somewhat superseded that page. Something that links up current 
> and future inbound features, or ideas in progress, might be good. We 
> should be wary of linking them to any particular release though.
>
> One way of thinking is that 11.1, 11.2 and 11.3 are the roadmap to 12.0!
> :-)
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
> --
Eric Bresie
ebre...@gmail.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists



Reply via email to