+0.1

I have (potentially) destroyed my Mac by upgrading to Big Sur just to find
out that my setup (e.g. no global JDK at all) isn't suitable for testing
the reported problem. All I can confirm is that using `--jdkhome
/path/to/jdk` works as always. I have no problems running NetBeans 12.2 RC3
(neither RC2) on my Big Sur Mac (but I am a power user).

-jt

PS: The UI of Big Sur is a step forward, it looks like KDE Plasma! At least
one benefit of upgrading!


čt 19. 11. 2020 v 20:45 odesílatel Laszlo Kishalmi <
[email protected]> napsal:

> Dear Apache NetBeans community,
>
> The third, and hopefully FINAL release candidate of Apache NetBeans 12.2
> is available.
>
> This one blocker, one trivial and one documentation fix is in this
> release as of:
>
> [NETBEANS-5042] Launcher can't find Java Home on MacOS BigSur --
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2547
> [NETBEANS-5043] Go to Declaration does not work in VSCode extension --
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2548
> PR-2546 End user oriented README.md and dedicated BUILD.md --
> https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/2546
>
>
> Technically these codechanges only affects the MacOS launcher and the
> upcoming VS Code Extension.
>
> I'm waiting for two positive tests from different individuals that the
> MacOS launcher works with BugSur and also two test that we did not break
> the MacOS launcher on older Mac versions.
>
> Please reply to this mail! Once I get those, I'm going to push another
> set of artifacts for voting.
>
> See the Artifacts on Jenkins:
>
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Netbeans/job/netbeans-TLP/job/netbeans/job/release122/19/artifact/dist/netbeans/
>
> --
>
> Laszlo Kishalmi
> Release Manager of Apache NetBeans 12.2
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to