I didn't see any autocompletion for sql editor 😜. Please kindly do it within LTS version 13. Its a kind request.
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 11:45 am Laszlo Kishalmi, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > As version 12.2 got out, it's probably a good time to look back on the > release process, while the memories are fresh, and check what can we > learn from that. Please add your feedback, raise concerns, add topics to > be discussed. > > What went well: > > - Well, the release is out, we almost made that in our projected > timeframe. (One of our fastest releases) > > - It seems managing the master, delivery and release branches worked > well without headache or too much overhead. I'd thank the contributors > to play well with the rules and supporting my requests. It is about 40+ > PR got merged into master while we were still working on the release > stabilization. > > - It was good to see a few first time contributors, and also the > increased activity around the PR processing. > > > What could be improved: > > - Well, the release speed is still not there where we imagined. Three > release candidates and two started votes are too much. > Partially due to my shortsightedness on the importance of Mac OS, BigSur > issue. I'm sorry for that. > > - Early feedback! Big Sur issue again. We have a quite a good number of > Mac OS users. Fight for yourselves! I can be convinced, it might be not > easy but can happen. So instead of voting 0 (saying meh), reason! > > - We need to add an API change review round even before branching for > the release. The round we had during this release convinced me that it > is required. I waited for that for Gradle 6.7, but actually that was > useless and other API exposure were finding hard time to fix their > issues while we were in beta phase. > > What needs to be discussed: > > These topics are loosely related to this release, and please open a new > thread when discussing these, but these are just piling up in me: > > - We still do not have a definitive answer, what do we want from an LTS > release (or do we want it all). Still I'll kick a round for 12.0u2 soon. > > - We still have not decided how the 12.3 and 13.0 would relate to each > other. (as the other side of the LTS topic) > > - Our love and hate relationship to nb-javac needs to be resolved. We > suggest people to go without it, then we suggest people to try that. > Also with the current release we see an increased amount of NPE-s and > parsing errors. If we would like to have it around, maybe we need to > able to patch it, even if outside Apache. But at the moment even me the > latest RM do not know what to think about that. > > -- > > Laszlo Kishalmi > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
