Yeah I'll update my steps for the next release.

I think I used that way because I spotted other Apache projects went with
that approach without realizing at the time the difference in format.

Thanks for highlighting this.

Regards

John

On Wed 2 Jun 2021, 13:03 Christian Oyarzun, <c...@oyarzun.net> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> On the macos you can use the following to be consistent with the other
> platforms.
>
> shasum -a 512 Apache-NetBeans-XX.X-bin-macosx.dmg >
> Apache-NetBeans-XX.X-bin-macosx.dmg.sha512
>
> --Christian
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 3:03 AM John Mc <mcdonnell.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > The SHA512 for the macos installers are generated with the following
> > command:
> >
> > `gpg --print-md SHA512 Apache-NetBeans-XX.X-bin-macosx.dmg >
> > Apache-NetBeans-XX.X-bin-macosx.dmg.sha512`
> > (where XX.X is the current version number)
> >
> > I'll check how the other binaries are done, and review...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 05:01, David Green <dgreen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think the file Apache-NetBeans-12.4-bin-macosx.dmg.sha512.txt on the
> > page
> > > https://netbeans.apache.org/download/nb124/nb124.html is not formatted
> > > correctly.  It certainly is not formatted the same as the Windows and
> > Linux
> > > ones and does not work with sha512sum (homebrew) nor shasum (macos)
> > command
> > > line program on the mac.
> > >
> > > Correct values but wrong format.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:38 AM David Green <dgreen...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Old news now but I wanted to note that the file
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://downloads.apache.org/netbeans/netbeans/12.3/Apache-NetBeans-12.3-bin-macosx.dmg.sha512
> > > > is in an improper format (right info but not ready for feeding into
> > > > shasum512).  The Linux and Windows ones are formatted correctly.
> > > > Thought I would pass this along in case there is a process that needs
> > > > adjusting before 12.4 posted.
> > > >
> > > > Dave
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to