I'm still a little confused though...why is the asf-site so far behind in some ways and/or ahead in others?
Assume the "ahead" may have to do with "generated files" that by nature may not get saved and accounts for some differences. If master has all the latest and greatest website changes, then the site build (where does that happen by the way?) and gets generated (i.e. html pages based on ascii doc for example not necessarily saved in apache/netbeans-website), why doesn't it include same changes? Eric Bresie [email protected] On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 11:36 AM Neil C Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2022, 17:20 Eric Bresie, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Should many of the commits on master be merged into asf-site or > visa-versa? > > > > No. asf-site is a branch written to by the build system with the build > output from building master. It's history is completely separate to what's > in master. Yes, it's a slightly curious hosting mechanism! > > Neil >
